As environmental deterioration and global warming is attracting more attention, this study investigates the environmental impact on the vendor or supplier selection problem. After re-examining the existing selection process, we first highlight the processes for qualification and final selection by considering environmental (or green) and traditional criteria. We next adopt an analytic network process (ANP) with the merits of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) to assess all factors for ranking suppliers for the certain and uncertain effects and also the dependences and feedback. In addition, this study integrates the content validity ratio and factor analysis into the solution procedure for the benefit of ANP analysis. Lastly, we illustrate a case of selecting suppliers for an electronics firm in Taiwan. The results show that the criteria of greatest concern are consistent delivery, flexibility, and cost, whereas environmental criteria are valued less. Based on the analysis, we provide some discussions and conclusions.
Analytic Network Process, ANP, Environmental management, Supplier selection, Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks, BOCR, Qualification.
rough set theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1200-1210.
Barbarosoglu, G., & Yazgac, T. (1997). An application of the analytic hierarchy
process to the supplier selection problem. APICS Production and Inventory
Management Journal, 38(1), 14-21.
Begi?evi?, N., Divjak, B., & Hunjak, T. (2010). Decision-making on prioritization of
projects in higher education institutions using the analytic network process approach.
Central European Journal of Operations Research, 18(3), 341-364.
Bottero, M., & Ferretti, V. (2011). An analytic network process-based approach for
location problems: The case of a new waste incinerator plant in the Province of
Torino (Italy). Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 17, 63-84.
Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Passaro, R. (2012). AHP-based approaches
for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives. Journal of Purchasing and Supply
Management, 18, 159-172.
Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy
DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert
Systems with Applications, 39, 3000-3011.
Chen, C.-C., Shih, H.-S., Shyur, H.-J., & Wu, K.-S. (2012). A business strategy
selection of green supply chain management via an analytic network process.
Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 64(8), 2544-2557.
Chiou, H.-K., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2002). Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making
approach for industrial green engineering. Environmental Management, 30(6),
Choi, T.Y., & Hartley, J.L. (1996). An exploration of supplier selection practices across
the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 14, 333-343.
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007). Supply chain management, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson.
Da?deviren, M., & Eraslan, E. (2008). Priority determination in strategic energy
policies in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision making.
International Journal of Energy Research, 32, 1047-1057.
de Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting
supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7,
Dobler, D.W., & Burt, D.N. (1996). Purchasing and supply management, 6th ed. New
Erdo?mu?, ?., Muzaffer, K., & Koç, E. (2005). Evaluating high-tech alternatives by
using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors. Evaluation and Program
Planning, 28, 391-399.
Erdo?mu?, ?., Aras, H., & Koç, E. (2006). Evaluation of alternative fuels for
residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group
decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10, 269-279.
Gencer, C., Gürpinar, D. (2007). Analytic network process in supplier selection: A
case study in an electronic firm. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31, 2475-2486.
Genoverse, A., Koh, S.C.L., Bruno, G., & Esposito, E. (2013). Green supplier
selection: State of the art and some empirical evidence. International Journal of
Production Research, 51(10), 2868-2886.
Green, K., Morton, B., New, S. (1996). Purchasing and environmental management:
interactions, policies and opportunities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(3),
Handfield, R.B., Walton, S.V., Sroufe, R., & Melnyk, S.A. (2002). Applying
environment criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytic
Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141, 70-87.
Hasanzadeh, M., Danehkar, A., & Azizi, M. (2013). The application of Analytical
Network Process to environmental prioritizing criteria for coastal oil jetties site
selection in Persian Gulf coasts (Iran). Ocean and Coastal Management, 73, 136-144.
Huang, S.H., & Keskar, H. (2007). Comprehensive and configurable metrics for
supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 105, 510-523.
Huang, Y.S., Liao, J.T., & Lin, Z.L. (2009). A study on aggregation of group decision.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, 445-454.
Humphreys, P.K., Wong, Y.K., & Chan, F.T.S. (2003). Integrating environmental
criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,
Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P.K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for
supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of
Operational Research, 202, 16-24.
Hsu, C.W., & Hu, A.H. (2009). Applying hazardous substance management to
supplier selection using analytic network process. Journal of Cleaner Production,
Kaiser, H.F. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401-415.
Kuo, R.J., & Lin, Y.J. (2012). Supplier selection using analytic network process and
data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11),
Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel
Psychology, 28, 563-575.
Lee, A.H.I., Chang, H.J., & Lin, C.Y. (2009). An evaluation model of buyer-supplier
relationships in high-tech industry ? The case of an electronic components
manufacturer in Taiwan. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 57, 1417-1430.
Leenders, M.R., Fearon, H.E., Flynn, A.E., & Johnson, P.F. (2002). Purchasing and
supply management. 11th ed., Boston: Irwin.
Nicosia, N., & Moore, N.Y. (2006). Implementing purchasing and supply chain
management: Best practices in market research. RAND Project Air Force, RAND
Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Noci, G. (1997). Designing green vendor rating systems for the assessment of a
supplier’s environmental performance. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply
Management, 3(2), 103-114.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T.L. (1989). Group decision making and the AHP, in Golden, B.L. et al. (Eds.)
The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and studies. Springer-Verlag, New
York, pp. 59-67.
Saaty, T.L. (2005). Theory and applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision
making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS
Saaty, T.L., & Özdemir, M.S. (2003). Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy
process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37(9-10), 1063-1075.
Saaty, T.L., & Özdemir, M.S. (2005). The encyclicon: A dictionary of decisions with
dependence and feedback based on the analytic network process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS
Shyur, H.J., & Shih, H.S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor
selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44(7-8), 749-761.
Sonmez, M. (2006). A review and critique of supplier selection process and practice.
Business School Occasional Papers Series paper 2006:1, Loughborough, UK:
Stevenson, W.J. (2009). Operations Management, 10th Ed. New York, NY:
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 5
th Ed. Boston,
Tahriri, F., Osman, M.R., & Yusuff, R.M. (2008). A review of supplier selection
methods in manufacturing industries. Suranaree Journal Science Technology, 15(3),
Ting, S.C., & Cho, D.I. (2008). An integrated approach for supplier selection and
purchasing decisions. Supply Chain Management, 13(2), 116-127.
Tuzkaya, G., Ozgen, A., Ozgen, D., & Tuzkaya, U.R. (2009). Environmental
performance evaluation of suppliers: A hybrid fuzzy multi criteria decision approach.
International Journal of Environment Science and Technology, 6(3), 477-490.
Ustun, O., & Demirtas, E.A. (2008). An integrated multi-objective decision-making
process for multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection. Omega, 36, 509-521.
Wadhwa, V., & Ravindran, A.R. (2007). Vendor selection in outsourcing. Computers
and Operations Research, 34(12), 3725-3737.
Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., & Benton, W.C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and
methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2-18.
Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2011). A literature review of decision-making models and
approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and
Supply Management, 17, 256-274.
Yang, J.L., Chiu, H.N., Tzeng, G.H., & Yeh, R.H. (2008). Vendor selection by
integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent
relationships. Information Sciences, 178, 4166-4183.
Yazgan, H.R., Boran, S., & Goztepe, K. (2010). Selection of dispatching rules in FMS:
ANP model based on BOCR with choquet integral. International Journal of
Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 49, 785-801.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.