SUBJECTIVE GEOMETRY FOR PROBLEM MODELING IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY/NETWORK PROCESSES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 2, 2022
Hsu-Shih Shih

Abstract

    This paper is in memory of Professor Thomas L. Saaty, who died on the 14th of August 2017.

In a problem-solving process, the first step is to model a real-world problem. The modeling effort is one of the hardest parts of the process, and there is no universal way to do it. The initial step involves structuring the problem and obtaining a simplified problem so that any multi-criteria or statistical models can be applied. This paper intends to explain the modeling process through subjective geometry. Although creative thinking is critical in developing the hierarchies and networks in the Analytic Hierarchy or Network Process (AHP/ANP), models from business management and information theories can supply a verified ready-to-use relationship among elements and their clusters. We hope the exploration offers a guideline for utilizing the AHP/ANP in more detail.

How to Cite

Shih, H.-S. (2022). SUBJECTIVE GEOMETRY FOR PROBLEM MODELING IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY/NETWORK PROCESSES. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v14i2.1012

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 48 | PDF Downloads 27

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

structure problem; subjective geometry; analytic hierarchy process; analytic network process; decision making; problem solving

References
Altshuller, G., Shapiro, R. (1956). About technical creativity. Questions of Psychology, 6, 37-49. (in Russian)

Chen, C.-C., Shih, H.-S. (2014), A study of the acceptance of wearable technology for consumers - An ANP perspective. 13th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, ISAHP 2014. Washington, DC, USA. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y2014.011

Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing, Second Edition. ISBN: 9780534260347.

De Risi, V. (2015)(Ed.). Mathematizing space: The objects of geometry from antiquity to the early modern age. Cham, Switzerland: Birkhäuser, Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/687011.

Einhorn, H. J., Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53-88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413.

Eves, H. (1972). A Survey of Geometry (Volume One). White Plains, New York, Allyn & Bacon, Longman, Revised Edition. ISBN: 9780205032266.

Gabus, A., Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL, 1-8. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland.

Gölcük, I., Baykasoğlu, A. (2016). Analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP. Expert Systems with Applications, 46, 346-366. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.041.

Hsu, T.-H., Huang, L.-C., Tang, J.-W. (2012). A hybrid ANP evaluation model for electronic service quality. Applied Soft Computing, 12(1), 72-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.09.008.

Hwang, C.-L., Lin, M.-J. (1987). Group decision making under multiple criteria. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61580-1.

Ishikawa, K. (1968). Guide to quality control. Tokyo: JUSE. ISBN: 978-9283310365.

Nguyen, H.T., Truong, T.C. (2022). Integral SWOT-AHP-TOWS model for strategic agricultural development in the context of drought: A case study in Ninh Thuan, Vietnam. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 14(1), 1-30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v14i1.890.

Nilashi, M., Ahmadi, H., Ahani, A., Ravangard, R., Ibrahima, O.B. (2016). Determining the importance of Hospital Information System adoption factors using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 244-264. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.008.

Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. ISBN: 9781447417101

Ou Yang, Y.-P., Shieh, H.-M., Leu, J.-D., Tzeng, G.-H. (2008), A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research, 5, 160-168.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156.

Poveda-Bautista, R., Baptista, D.C., García-Melón, M. (2012). Setting competitiveness indicators using BSC and ANP. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 4738-4752. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.657964.

Robertson, Jr., D. W. (1946). A note on the classical origin of "circumstances" in the medieval confessional. Studies in Philology, 6-14.

Rowe, A. J., Boulgarides, J. D. (1992). Managerial decision making. New York: Macmillan. ISBN: 9780024041111.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 9780070543713.

Saaty, T.L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. ISBN: 9780962031793.

Saaty, T.L. (2001), Creative thinking, problem solving and decision making. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. ISBN: ‎ 9781888603033.

Saaty, T.L. (2005a). Theory and applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. ISBN: 9781888603064.

Saaty, T.L. (2005b). Making and validating complex decisions with the AHP/ANP. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14, 1-36. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0179-6.

Saaty, T.L., Özdemir, M.S. (2003). Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37(9-10), 1063 -1075. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)00118-3.

Saaty, T.L., Özdemir, M.S. (2005). The Eecyclicon: A dictionary of decisions with dependence and feedback based on the Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. ISBN: 9781888603057.

Saaty, T.L., Takizawa, M. (1986). Dependence and independence − from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 26, 229-237. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90184-0.

Saaty, T.L., Shih, H.-S. (2009). Structures in decision making: On the subjective geometry of hierarchies and networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 867-872. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.064.

Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G. (1994). Decision making in economic, political, social and technological environments: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. ISBN: 9780962031779.

Shih, H.-S. (2008). Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 720-734. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.012.

Shih, H.-S., Cheng, C.-B., Chen, C.-C., Lin, Y.-C. (2014), Environmental impact on the vendor selection problem in electronics firms – A systematic analytic network process with BOCR. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 6(2), 1-25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v6i2.256.

Shih, H.-S., Olson, D.L. (2022). TOPSIS and its extensions: A distance-based MCDM approach. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. ISBN: 9783031095764.

Shyur, H.-J., Shih, H.-S. (2006), A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44(7-8), 749-761. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018.

Simon, H.A. (1977). The new science of management decision. 3rd Ed., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780136161363.

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York: Random House. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912453184-22.

Tabak, J. (2014). Geometry: the language of space and form. New York: Infobase Publishing. ISBN 9780816049530.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D, (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.

Whiteley, W. (2015). Geometric cognition. In V Danesi, M. (ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on math cognition. 247-262. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22537-7_13

Wijnmalen, D.J.D. (2007). Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP–ANP: A critical validation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), 892-905. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.020.

Wu, K.-J., Tseng, M.-L., Chiu, A.S.F. (2012). Using the Analytical Network Process in Porter’s Five Forces Analysis – Case study in Philippines. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, 1-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1151.

Yusof, M.M., Kuljis, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A., Stergioulas, L.K. (2008). An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(6), 386-398. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011.

Yüksel, İ, Dağdeviren, M. (2007). Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis – A case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3364-3382. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.01.001.


Section
Articles