STRATEGIC ENHANCEMENT OF WORKPLACE SAFETY IN SMALL SCALE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES USING AHP APPROACH Identification of safety parameters using AHP
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Despite progress in technology, workplace safety in small scale manufacturing industries (SSMIs) still lacks the required attention. Occupational safety of workers is one of the major concerns for organizations as it involves a number of factors that affect many direct and indirect costs of the industry. To this end, the current study was conducted in order to determine the key factors that affect workplace safety. A total of nine main factors and twenty-two sub-factors were identified and then prioritized using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Opinions from experienced and proficient experts were recorded on a framed questionnaire for all the above factors. The effectiveness of the study was ensured by maintaining a consistency ratio of less than 10% for the factors and sub-factors. The factor personal protective equipment was found to have the highest Eigen vector of 27.4%, and therefore the highest priority. Organizational attributes and hygiene are the factors that demand the next level of priority, whereas, equipment and hand tools safety and machine guarding, and material handling are the factors requiring the least priority. The outcome of this analysis enables the small scale manufacturing industries to effectively implement safety measures by giving priority to the factors in the order specified by the study. This would empower the organizational safety standards and benefit not only the employees but also the employers without considerable costs.
How to Cite
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
analytical hierarchy process (AHP); small scale manufacturing industry (SSMI); workplace safety; safety factors, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), small scale manufacturing industry (SSMI), workplace safety factors
Akarte, M., Surendra, N., Ravi, B., and Rangaraj, N. (2001). Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(5), 511-522. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jors.2601124
Al-Harbi, K. M. A. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 19-27. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-7863(99)00038-1
Andersson, R., and Menckel, E. (1995). On the prevention of accidents and injuries: a comparative analysis of conceptual frameworks. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27(6), 757-768. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(95)00031-3
Arbel, A., and Orgler, Y. E. (1990). An application of the AHP to bank strategic planning: The mergers and acquisitions process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 27-37. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90058-j
Armacost, R. L., Componation, P. J., Mullens, M. A., and Swart, W. W. (1994). An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: an industrialized housing application. IIE Transactions, 26(4), 72-79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179408966620
Atsumbe, B., Amine, J., Umar, I., and Salawu, J. (2012). Appraisal of occupational safety in manufacturing industries in Kaduna and Niger states of Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 6, 55-62.
Badri, M. A. (2001). A combined AHP–GP model for quality control systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 72(1), 27-40. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5273(00)00077-3
Bayazit, O. (2005). Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(7), 808-819. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380510626204
Bhagwat, R., and Sharma, M. (2007). Information system architecture: a framework for a cluster of small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Production Planning & Control, 18(4), 283-296. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280701248578
Boucher, T. O., and MacStravic, E. L. (1991). Multiattribute evaluation within a present value framework and its relation to the analytic hierarchy process. The Engineering Economist, 37(1), 1-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00137919108903055
Brauer, R. L. (2016). Safety and health for engineers. John Wiley & Sons.
Cambron, K. E., and Evans, G. W. (1991). Layout design using the analytic hierarchy process. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 20(2), 211-229. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(91)90026-3
Das, M. C., Sarkar, B., and Ray, S. (2012). A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(3), 230-241. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2011.12.001
Feyer, A.-M., and Williamson, A. M. (1991). A classification system for causes of occupational accidents for use in preventive strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 302-311. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1698
Harker, P. T., and Vargas, L. G. (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 33(11), 1383-1403. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383
Kwon, O.-J., and Kim, Y.-S. (2013). An analysis of safeness of work environment in Korean manufacturing: The “safety climate” perspective. Safety Science, 53, 233-239. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.10.009
Marhavilas, P.-K., Koulouriotis, D., and Gemeni, V. (2011). Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(5), 477-523. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.03.004
Mudavanhu, N., Zhou, T., and Dzomba, P. (2013). An assessment of small and medium enterprise owners’ occupational safety and health efforts: the case of Southerton, Harare, Zimbabwe. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports, 4(3), 407-418. Doi: https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2014/6263
Peterson, D. (2005). Safety improvement: Perception surveys can reveal strengths and weaknesses. Professional Safety, 50(1), 45-48.
Saaty, T. L. (1985). Decision making for leaders. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3, 450-452.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i
Saiyed, H. N., and Tiwari, R. R. (2004). Occupational health research in India. Industrial Health, 42(2), 141-148. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.42.141
Shikdar, A. A., and Al-Araimi, S. A. (2001). Ergonomic conditions in small manufacturing industries" Sultan Qaboos University Journal for Science [SQUJS], 6(1), 61-70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24200/squjs.vol6iss1pp61-70
Shikdar, A. A., and Sawaqed, N. M. (2003). Worker productivity, and occupational health and safety issues in selected industries. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 45(4), 563-572. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-8352(03)00074-3
Singh, L. P. (2018). Work study and ergonomics. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
Singh, L. P., Bhardwaj, A., Deepak, K., and Bedi, R. (2009). Occupational noise exposure in small scale hand tools manufacturing (forging) industry (SSI) in Northern India. Industrial Health, 47(4), 423-430. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.47.423
Singh, S., Singh, L. P., and Kaur, M. (2016). Analytical Hierarchy process-based methodology for selection of safety parameters in manufacturing industry. In Arezes P. (Ed.) Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors, 491, Springer, Cham. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41929-9_33
Singh, S., Singh, L. P. (2016). Selection of occupational safety factors related to small scale manufacturing industry. 14th International Conference on Humanizing Work and Work Environment HWWE-2016.
Triantaphyllou, E., and Mann, S. H. (1995). Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2(1), 35-44.
Viswanadhan, K. (2005). How to get responses for multi-criteria decisions in engineering education–an AHP based approach for selection of measuring instrument. Financial Support, 20.
Vredenburgh, A. G. (2002). Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates?. Journal of Safety Research, 33(2), 259-276. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.07.040
Wang, D., and Wang, X. (2010). Research on the green vendor selection index weight of iron & steel enterprises based on AHP and entropy method. Soft Science,8, 025.
Wani, V., Garg, T., and Sharma, S. (2004). Effective industry/institute interaction for developing entrepreneurial vision amongst engineers for the sustainable development of SMEs in India. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 3(1), 38-55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijttc.2004.003522
Wilson, J. R., and Corlett, N. (2005). Evaluation of human work. CRC press.
Zwetsloot, G., and Leka, S. (2010). Corporate culture, health, and well-being. Occupational Health Psychology, 21(2) 250-268.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.