WHEN SHOULD POLAND ENTER THE EURO ZONE?
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The paper presents a solution to a real, current and significant problem for Poland. Poland, as a new EU country should join the Economic and Monetary Union – the Euro Zone – after fulfilling the convergence criteria set by the Maastricht Treaty, as soon as possible. Entering the zone, it should gain in many economic, social and political fields. We can therefore look for new opportunities. However, entering the Euro Zone also results in costs and risks. The paper aims to find such an alternative, which would maximize benefits and opportunities, and minimize costs and risks. The alternatives were developed – early, medium-term and late entry of Poland’s into the Euro Zone. The problem was solved by use of Analytic Network Process. Whether using the multiplicative or the additive/negative mathematical formulae, the conclusions show, without any doubt, that Poland should enter the Euro Zone late, that is, after 2011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v1i2.55
How to Cite
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Euro Zone, convergence indicators, Analytic Network Process, ANP
wybranych problemów organizacyjnego i mened?erskich ,(Multiple Criteria Decision Suport in
Organizational and Management Chosen Problems Solving), Badania Operacyjne i Decyzje, Nr 2
Blaski i cienie wej?cia Polski do strefy euro (Light and Shade of Poland’s entrance into the Euro
Zone). Conference organized by the Senate Committee for the European Union, 15.11.2006,
www.senat.gov.pl.k6/agendaseminar/blaski/061115.htm.
Figueria J., Greco S., & Ehrgott M. (edit.) (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of
the Art Surveys, Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
Glapik E. (2007). Blakn?cy czar wspólnej waluty (Fading light of common currency).
Rzeczpospolita 12.03.2007
Mazur J. (2002), Argumenty za i przeciw Unii Gospodarczej i Walutowej (Arguments for and
against the European Economic and Monetary Union). G?os 31.08.2002
Mazur J. (2006). Likwidacja polskiego z?otego, likwidacja pa?stwa (Elimination of the Polish
zloty, elimination of the state), http://web.1asphost.com (Tera 2) likwidacja pa?stwa
polskiego.htm
Pi?ski A. & Pi?ski J., Euro 2012. Wprost, 19 (14 May 2006 r), s. 44 – 48.
Polska w strefie euro: szanse i wyzwania (Poland in the Euro Zone: opportunities and challenges).
Conference organized by the Institute for International Affairs and the Polish Sejm 13.10.2006,
Rzeczpospolita: head-arok 22.gif
Saaty R.W. (2002). Decision Making. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Dependence and
Feedback, a manual for the ANP Software Super Decisions, Creative Decisions Foundation,
Pittsburgh, PA
Saaty T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty T.L. (2001). The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS. Publications.
Saaty T.L. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA:
RWS Publications.
Schael T. (1997). Theorie et Practique du Workflow. Paris: Springer
Strategia integracyjna z Uni? Europejsk? na okres poakcesyjny 2004 – 2015 (European Integration
strategy for post-accession period 2004 – 2015), Scientific Conference 25.06.2002,
www.prezydent.pl
Nowak, A.Z. & St?pniak, A. (eds.) (2003) Strefa euro – wyzwanie dla Polski (The Euro Zone – a
challenge for Poland). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydzia?u Zarz?dzania Uniwersytetu
Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2003
Waluta biurokratów (The currency of bureaucrats). Interview with G.S. Becker by L.M. Bednarz,
Wprost Nr 19 (14 May 2006)
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.