TREATMENT FOR CASE OF DEFAULT OF LIFE INSURANCE UNDER CAPITALIZATION REGIME IN THE BRAZILIAN MARKET USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The Brazilian insurance market is growing, even if it is still incipient compared to many international markets. Although economic issues end up partially inhibiting this activity, insurance in general and particularly life insurance can be considered a financial investment for the general population. However, insurance default in the Brazilian market is a serious problem and, as such, requires analysis and action. This article aims to use the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to select an alternative that best meets the needs of an independent insurer to deal with cases of default on life insurance under a capitalization regime and, at the same time, remain within legal standards and deliver the best service to its customers. The fundamental concepts, methodology, results and analysis are presented in this article.
How to Cite
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Life insurance, Insurance default, AHP
Amirabadi, S., & Univarsity, A. (2011). A mathematical method for preventing inconsistency in decision maker’s comparisons. Proceedings of XI Symposium of Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. Sorrento, Naples (Italy).
Andawaningtyas, K., Ardiyani, E., & Karim, C. (2022). Analysis of insurance customer factors to renewal using Hybrid AHP-FTOPSIS. Cauchy: Jurnal Matematika Murni dan Aplikasi, 7(2), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.18860/ca.v7i2.13356
Araújo, R. L. B. (2021). Private management of social security in Brazil, under the capitalization regime. [Master’s dissertation, FGV - Fundação Getúlio Vargas, RJ, Brazil]. https://hdl.handle.net/10438/32763
Arena, M. (2008). Does insurance market activity promote economic growth? A cross‐country study for industrialized and developing countries. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 75(4), 921-946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00291.x
Barbosa, N. P., dos Santos, I. M., de Carvalho K. V. D., & Pereira, G. A. (2023). The default of Brazilian families: an analysis of economic factors. Cadernos de Estudos Interdisciplinares, 5(1), 53-68. http://publicacoes.unifal-mg.edu.br/revistas/index.php/cei/article/view/2024
Barucci, E., Colozza, T., Marazzina, D., & Rroji, E. (2020). The determinants of lapse rates in the Italian life insurance market. European Actuarial Journal, 10, 149-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-020-00227-0
Braun, A., Fischer, M., & Schmeiser, H. (2019). How to derive optimal guarantee levels in participating life insurance contracts. Journal of Risk Finance, 20(5), 445-469. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-07-2018-0099
Cavallo, B., Ishizaka, A., Olivieri, M. G., & Squillante, M. (2019). Comparing inconsistency of pairwise comparison matrices depending on entries. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(5), 842-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1464427
Cavallo, B., D'Apuzzo, L., & Squillante, M. (2012). About a consistency index for pairwise comparison matrices over a divisible alo‐group. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 27(2), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21518
Castro, A. (2004). The insurance sector and relationship marketing. [Master’s thesis Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, RJ, Brazil] https://repositorio.fgv.br/server/api/core/bitstreams/73fdb19a-aa5b-4d06-9839-789cb289e88f/content
Cheng, C., & Li, J. (2018). Early default risk and surrender risk: Impacts on participating life insurance policies. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 78, 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2017.11.001
CNseg. National Confederation of Insurers. (2023). Setor segurador crescera acima de 10% em 2023 e 2024. https://cnseg.org.br/noticias/c-nseg-setor-segurador-crescera-acima-de-10-em-2023-e-2024
Coe, N. B., Belbase, A., & Wu, A. Y. (2016). Overcoming barriers to life insurance coverage: A behavioral approach. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 19(2), 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12064
Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., & Edwards, D. J. (2018). Review of application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5), 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098
Daros, M., & Pinto, N. G. M. (2017). Delinquency in Brazil: an analysis of empirical evidence. IMED Journal of Administration, 7(1), 208-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956/raimed.v7n1p208-229
Dawar, V. K., Singh, P., & Uppal, K. K. (2022). Determinants’ hierarchy of decision for life insurance on digital platform: an Analytical Hierarchy Process approach. IPE Journal of Management, 12(2), 9-19.
Dogan, O. (2021). Process mining technology selection with spherical fuzzy AHP and sensitivity analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 178, 114999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114999
Dweiri, F., Kumar, S., Khan, S. A., & Jain, V. (2016). Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 62, 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030
Emrouznejad, A, & Marra, M. (2017). The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): A literature review with a social network analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 6653-6675. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1334976
Fang, H., & Kung, E. (2021). Why do life insurance policyholders lapse? The roles of income, health, and bequest motive shocks. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 88(4), 937-970. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12332
Forman E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, n.108, 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0
García-Cascales, M. S., & Lamata, M. T. (2012). On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 56(5-6), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.022
Haviluddin, H., Budiman , E., & Ramadhan , R. (2022). Implementation of the Analytical Hierarchy Process method and Multi Objective Optimization on the basis of ratio analysis in the selection of insurance products. International Journal of Advanced Science and Computer Applications, 1(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.47679/ijasca.v1i1.8
Hinduja, A., & Pandey, M. (2018). An intuitionistic fuzzy AHP based multi criteria recommender system for life insurance products. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Computers, Science and Engineering, 7(1), 1-8.
Ho, C. C., Huang, C., & Ou, C. Y. (2018). Analysis of the factors influencing sustainable development in the insurance industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 391-410. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1467
Hu, S., O’Hagan, A., Sweeney, J., & Ghahramani, M. (2021). A spatial machine learning model for analysing customers’ lapse behaviour in life insurance. Annals of Actuarial Science, 15(2), 367-393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748499520000329
Ikeda, M. M. S., & Carvalho, J. V. F. (2022). Feasibility of universal life in Brazil from the perspective of supply and demand for life insurance. Revista Contabilidade e Finanças, USP, São Paulo, 33(89), 343-358. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202113720
Kaftandzieva, T., & Cvetkoska, V. (2021). Financial decision making among young adults: an AHP approach. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 13(3), 458-482. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v13i3.864
Konomura, K., Hoshino, E., Sakai, K., Fukuda, T., & Tajima, G. (2023). Development of a model for quantitative assessment of newborn screening in Japan using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Neonatal Screening, 9(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9030039
Leite, I. M. S., & Freitas, F. F. T. (2012). Análise comparativa dos métodos de apoio multicritério a decisão: AHP, ELECTRE e PROMETHEE. XXXII Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção. Bento Gonçalves.
Lin, J. H., Li, X., & Huang, F. W. (2018). Insurer interest margin management, default risk, and life insurance policyholder protection. Journal of Modelling in Management, 13(3), 718-735. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-12-2017-0140
Lyons, P. & Demaster, B. (2015, March 25). How life insurers can bring their business into the 21st century. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2015/03/how-life-insurers-can-bring-their-business-into-the-21st-century
Malhotra, V. A., Lee, M. D., & Khurana, (2007). Domain experts influence decision quality: towards a robust method for their identification. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 57, 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.09.007
Mimović, P., Jakšić, M., & Todorović, V. (2017). Choice of life insurance companies by using analytic hierarchy process: Experience of the Republic of Serbia. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, 3(1), 1-18.
Moslem, S., Saraji, M. K., Mardani, A., Alkharabsheh, A., Duleba S., &. Esztergár-Kiss, D. (2023). A systematic review of Analytic Hierarchy Process applications to solve transportation problems: from 2003 to 2022. IEEE Access, 11, 11973-11990. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3234298
Mulholland, B. S., & Finke, M. S. (2023). Cognitive ability impact on life insurance lapsation. Financial Services Review, 31(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v31i1.3196
Nabavi, S. R., Wang, Z., & Rangaiah, G. P. (2023). Sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for engineering applications. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 62(17), 6707-6722. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c04270
Nugroho, W. R., & Marzuki, Y. (2024). Legal protection for consumers of unit link life insurance products. International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics, 2(6), 1693-1702. https://doi.org/10.54443/sj.v2i6.260
Pant, S., Kumar, A., Ram, M., Klochkov, Y., & Sharma, H. K. (2022). Consistency indices in Analytic Hierarchy Process: a review. Mathematics, 10(8), 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081206
Petrillo, A., Salomon, V. A. P., & Tramarico, C. L. (2023). State-of-the-art review on the Analytic Hierarchy Process with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. Journal of Risk Financial Management, 16, 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16080372
Raišienė, A. G., & Raišys, S. J. (2022). Business customer satisfaction with B2B consulting services: AHP-based criteria for a new perspective. Sustainability, 14, 7437. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127437
Rodrigues, W. T. (2019). Sale of life insurance in Brazil. [Master’s thesis, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, SP, Brazil]. https://hdl.handle.net/10438/27396
Romero-Ramos, J. A., Gil, J. D., Cardemil, J. M., Escobar, R. A., Arias, I., & Pérez-García, M. (2023). A GIS-AHP approach for determining the potential of solar energy to meet the thermal demand in southeastern Spain productive enclaves. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 176, 113205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113205
Saeedpoor, M., Vafadarnikjoo, A., Mobin, M., & Rastegari, A. (2015). A SERVQUAL model approach integrated with fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies to rank life insurance firms. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015. Vol 1.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision making for leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Santri, S. H., Yaswirman, Y., Warman, K., & Fauzi, W. (2022). Default unitlink-based life insurance company in Indonesia. Proceeding International Conference on Malay Identity, 3, 218-227. http://www.conference.unja.ac.id/ICMI/article/view/219
Schoner, B., & Wedley, W. C. (1989). Ambiguous criteria weigth in AHP: consequences and solutions. Decision Sciences, 20, 462-475, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01561.x
Serasa Experian (2024). Map of default and debt negotiation in Brazil. https://www.serasa.com.br/limpa-nome-online/blog/mapa-da-inadimplencia-e-renogociacao-de-dividas-no-brasil
Serra Costa, J. F. da (2011). A genetic algorithm to obtain consistency in analytic hierarchy process. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 8(1), 55-64. https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V8N1A4
Shamsuddin, S. N., Ismail, N., & Roslan, N. F. (2022). What we know about research on life insurance lapse: A bibliometric analysis. Risks, 10(5), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10050097
Silva, S. E. P. (2022). Insurance, pension plans and capitalization. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Senac.
Silva, F. L., Peris, R. W., Chan, B. L., & Borelli, E. (2015). Evolution of the insurance market and economic growth in Brazil. Redeca, 2(2), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.23925/2446-9513.2015v2i2p21-36
Sooksaksun, N. & Chanta, S. (2023). Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process in decision making of processed banana products for community enterprises. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 15(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v15i2.1091
Souza, M. L. M. (2017). General theory of insurance. Rio de Janeiro, Funenseg: Brazil.
SUSEP. Superintendence of Private Insurance. (2022a). About SUSEP. https://www.gov.br/susep/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/institucional/sobre-a-susep
SUSEP. Superintendence of Private Insurance. (2022b). Basic Legislation. https://www2.susep.gov.br/safe/scripts/bnweb/bnmapi.exe?router=upload/26148
SUSEP. Superintendence of Private Insurance. (2022c). Subjects/My Secure Future. https://www.gov.br/susep/pt-br/assuntos/meu-futuro-seguro/seguros-previdencia-e-capitalizacao/seguros/seguro-vgbl-vrgp-vagp-vrsa-vri-dotal/explicacao
SUSEP. Superintendence of Private Insurance. (2023). Guidance and Defense Guide for the Insured. https://www2.susep.gov.br/download/cartilha/cartilha_susep2e.pdf
SUSEP. Superintendence of Private Insurance. (2024a). Archives/Archives-statistical-data/Monthly syntheses/2024. https://www.gov.br/susep/pt-br/arquivos/arquivos-dados-estatisticos/sinteses-mensais/2024/SnteseMensalMaiode2024final1.pdf
SUSEP. Superintendence of Private Insurance. (2024b). Content Center. https://www.gov.br/susep/pt-br/central-de-conteudos/noticias/2024/fevereiro/setor-de-seguros-cresce-9-em-2023-e-supera-r-380-bilhoes-arrecadados
Toshmurzaevich, Y. O. (2020). Developing the underwriting process in life insurance, European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(6), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.6.657
Vargas, L. G. (1982). Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients. Mathematical Modelling, 3, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(82)90013-6
Wang, Y., & Luo, Y. (2009). On rank reversal in decision analysis. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(5-6), 1221-1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.019
Wang, Z. L., Kim, J., Selvachandran, G., Smarandache, F., Abdel-Basset, M., Thong, P. H., & Ismail, M. (2019). Decision making methods for evaluation of efficiency of general insurance companies in Malaysia: A comparative study. IEEE Access, 7, 160637-160649. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950455
Wang, X., & Triantaphyllou, E. (2008). Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods, Omega, 36, 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003
Yu, L., Cheng, J. & Lin, T. (2019). Life insurance lapse behaviour: evidence from China. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, 44, 653–678. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-018-0104-5
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.