COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON DECISION CRITERIA FOR PORT PERSONNEL USING HYBRID ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (H-AHP)

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 16, 2023
Muhamad Safuan Shamshol Bahri S. Sarifah Radiah Shariff Nazry Yahya

Abstract

The demand for talented labor to serve the maritime logistics, particularly in port operations, is growing as the industry expands globally. This requires professional competency in terms of manpower and skills that must be developed effectively. Furthermore, considering the harm done to the industry from the COVID-19 pandemic, capable professionals in port management are a crucial part to reviving the business and its long-term growth and viability. This study explores the criteria for the needed talent from the perspective of port logistics experts using  the following multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approaches: Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Preference Ranking Organization System Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE). The objective of this study is to identify the important criteria for personnel performance evaluation in the port marine logistics industry. In order to determine the performance evaluation framework for personnel performance evaluation, the study uses the AHP method to calculate the weightage of the criteria. The highest weightage is Work Attitude (0.560), followed by Job Performance (0.298) and Work Ability (0.120). Lastly, in order to identify the suitable hybrid MCDM approaches for personnel performance evaluation in the port marine logistics industry, three different MCDM approaches (AHP, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE) were used and the results show that the AHP is the best MCDM method to rank the personnel in the port industry by obtaining the highest Kendall’s Tau coefficient of 0.619.

How to Cite

Shamshol Bahri, M. S., Shariff, S. S. R., & Yahya, N. (2023). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON DECISION CRITERIA FOR PORT PERSONNEL USING HYBRID ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (H-AHP). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v14i3.974

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 557 | PDF Downloads 312

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, hybrid, Marine personnel, Analytical Hierarchy Process

References
AbdHamid, A.S. (2020, February 24). Plug the gaps to make Malaysia a maritime nation, Borneo Post online. https://www.theborneopost.com/2020/02/24/plug-the-gaps-to-make-malaysia-a-maritime-nation/

Benjamin, R. (2019, April 9). Mismatch of skills and jobs, The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2019/04/09/mismatch-of-skills-and-jobs

Cicek, K., Akyuz, E., & Celik, M. (2019). Future skills requirements analysis in maritime industry. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 270-274. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.051

Demirci, A. E., & Kılıç, H. S. (2019). Personnel selection based on integrated multi-criteria decision making techniques. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 31(2), 163-178.

Heidary Dahooie, J., Beheshti Jazan Abadi, E., Vanaki, A. S., & Firoozfar, H. R. (2018). Competency‐based IT personnel selection using a hybrid SWARA and ARAS‐G methodology. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28(1), 5-16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20713

Herrera-Viedma, E., Palomares, I., Li, C. C., Cabrerizo, F. J., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2020). Revisiting fuzzy and linguistic decision making: Scenarios and challenges for making wiser decisions in a better way. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(1), 191-208. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2020.3043016

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Multiple Attribute Decision Making, 1, 58-191. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3

Ighravwe, D. E., Babatunde, M. O., Mosetlhe, T. C., Aikhuele, D., & Akinyele, D. (2021). A MCDM-based framework for the selection of renewable energy system simulation tool for teaching and learning at university level. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(11), 1-22. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01981-1

Industry Growth Insights. (2021). Global maritime logistics market by type (General cargo maritime logistics, bulk cargo maritime logistics, maritime logistic), by application (port service, coastal service, other) and by region (North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Middle East & Africa), forecast from 2022 to 2030. https://industrygrowthinsights.com/report/maritime-logistics-market/, retrieved November 8, 2022.

Ingwersen, W., Cabezas, H., Weisbrod, A. V., Eason, T., Demeke, B., Ma, X., ... & Ceja, M. (2014). Integrated metrics for improving the life cycle approach to assessing product system sustainability. Sustainability, 6(3), 1386-1413.

Kahraman, C., Ateş, N. Y., Çevik, S., Gülbay, M., & Erdoğan, S. A. (2007). Hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS model for selection among logistics information technologies. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(2), 143-168. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390710725742

Kolios, A., Mytilinou, V., Lozano-Minguez, E., & Salonitis, K. (2016). A comparative study of multiple-criteria decision-making methods under stochastic inputs. Energies, 9(7), 566. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en9070566

Korkmaz, O. (2019). Personnel selection method based on TOPSIS multi-criteria decision making method. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 23, 1-16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.468486

Lima-Junior, F. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2020). An adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system to supply chain performance evaluation based on SCOR® metrics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106191. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106191

Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307-317. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00153-x

Mesghouni, K., Pesin, P., Trentesaux, D., Hammadi, S., Tahon, C., & Borne, P. (1999). Hybrid approach to decision-making for job-shop scheduling. Production Planning & Control, 10, 690–706. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/095372899232768

Meybodi, M. Z. (2015). Consistency of strategic and tactical benchmarking performance measures. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(6), 1019-1032. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2013-0074

Mi, X., Tang, M., Liao, H., Shen, W., & Lev, B. (2019). The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?. Omega, 87, 205-225. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.01.009

Othman, M. K., Rahman, N. S. F. A., Ismail, A., & Saharuddin, A. H. (2020). Factors contributing to the imbalances of cargo flows in Malaysia large-scale minor ports using a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) approach. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(3), 113-126. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.12.012

Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full consistency method (fucom). Symmetry, 10(9), 393. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090393

Qu, Q., Chen, K. Y., Wei, Y. M., Liu, Y., Tsai, S. B., & Dong, W. (2015). Using hybrid model to evaluate performance of innovation and technology professionals in marine logistics industry. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/361275

Rahul, B., Dey, P. K., Ghosh, S. K., & Konstantinos, P. (2018). Strategic maintenance technique selection using combined quality function deployment, the analytic hierarchy process and the benefit of doubt approach. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(1-4), 31-44. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9540-1

Ramsey, P. H. (1989) Critical values for Spearman’s rank-order correlation. Journal of Educational Statistics, 14(3), 245-253. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986014003245

Saaty, T. L., & Ergu, D. (2015). When is a decision-making method trustworthy? criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14, 1171–1187. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/s021962201550025x

Saaty, T.L., (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i

Sharma, M., & Sehrawat, R. (2020). A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method for cloud adoption: Evidence from the healthcare sector. Technology in Society, 61, 101258. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101258

Shyur, H.-J., & Shih, H.-S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44, 749–761. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018

Solangi, Y. A., Longsheng, C., & Shah, S. A. A. (2021). Assessing and overcoming the renewable energy barriers for sustainable development in Pakistan: An integrated AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Renewable Energy, 173, 209-222. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.141

Turcksin, L., Bernardini, A., & Macharis, C. (2011). A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 954-965. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104

Van Der Vleuten, C. P., & Schuwirth, L. W. (2005). Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Medical Education, 39(3), 309-317. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x

Yadav, A., Anis, M., Ali, M., & Tuladhar, S. (2015). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for analysis: selection of passenger airlines for Gulf country. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 6(3), 379-389.

Zavadskas, E. K., Govindan, K., Antucheviciene, J., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications for sustainability issues. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 857-887. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2016.1237302

Zhu, Y., Tian, D., & Yan, F. (2020). Effectiveness of entropy weight method in decision-making. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020.
Section
Articles