How the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process Supports a More Responsible and Committed Research and Innovation

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 19, 2021
Hannia Gonzalez-Urango

Abstract

This essay is a brief presentation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). It is an interesting framework that the European Union has been building around science that is more aware of global challenges. It also highlights the usefulness of AHP/ANP as valuable tools to handle the complexities derived from the implementation of a multidimensional concept such as RRI.

How to Cite

Gonzalez-Urango, H. (2021). How the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process Supports a More Responsible and Committed Research and Innovation . International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v13i3.949

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 280 | PDF Downloads 61

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI, AHP, ANP

References
Corona-Sobrino, C., García-Melón, M., Poveda-Bautista, R., & Gonzalez-Urango, H. (2020). Closing the gender gap at academic conferences : A tool for monitoring and assessing academic events. PLoS ONE, 15(12), 1–23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243549

García-Melón, M., Gómez-Navarro, T., Gonzalez-Urango, H., & Corona-Sobrino, C. (Forthcoming.). Adapting RRI public engagement indicators to the Spanish scientific and innovation context. A participatory methodology based on AHP and Content Analysis. Central European Journal of Operations Research.

Gonzalez-Urango, Hannia García-Melón, M., Monsonís Payá, I., Otero-Hermida, P., García Lozano, J. F., Gómez Navarro, T., Miralles, C., & Jiménez Sáez, F. (2020). Propuesta de indicadores para impulsar el diseño de una política orientada al desarrollo de investigación e innovación responsable en España. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4293484

Gonzalez-Urango, H. (2020). A participatory multicriteria approach to evaluate strategic projects for local sustainable development [Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain (2020)]. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3992673

Gonzalez-Urango, H., Mu, E., & García-Melón, M. (2022). Stakeholder engagement and ANP best research practices in sustainable territorial and urban strategic planning. In M. Doumpos, F. A. F. Ferreira, & C. Zopounidis (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Development. Springer International Publishing.

Ishizaka, A., Pearman, C., & Nemery, P. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4767–4784. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.657966

Ligardo-Herrera, I., Gómez-Navarro, T., & Gonzalez-Urango, H. (2019). Application of the ANP to the prioritization of project stakeholders in the context of responsible research and innovation. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 27(3), 679–701. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0573-4

Mejlgaard, N., Woolley, R., Bloch, C., Bührer, S., Griessler, E., Jäger, A., Lindner, R., Madsen, E. B., Maier, F., Meijer, I., Peter, V., Stilgoe, J., & Wuketich, M. (2018). A key moment for European science policy. Journal of Science Communication, 17(3), 1–6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17030305

Monsonís-Payá, I., García-Melón, M., & Lozano, J. F. (2017). Indicators for responsible research and innovation: A methodological proposal for context-based weighting. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12). Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122168

Mu, E., & Pereyra-Rojas, M. (2015). Impact on society versus impact on knowledge: Why Latin American scholars do not participate in Latin American studies. Latin American Research Review, 50(2), 216–238. Doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43670297

Otero-Hermida, P., & García-Melón, M. (2018). Gender equality indicators for research and innovation from a responsible perspective: The case of Spain. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(9). Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092980

Pereyra-Rojas, M., Mu, E., Gaskin, J., & Lingham, T. (2017). The higher-ed organizational-scholar tension: How scholarship compatibility and the alignment of organizational and faculty skills, values and support affects scholar’s performance and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(MAR), 450. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2017.00450/BIBTEX

Saaty, T. L. (1980). Decision-making for leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill.

Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The Analytic Network Proces. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. Doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Strand, R., Spaapen, J., Bauer, M. W., Hogan, E., Revuelta, G., Stagl, S., Paula, L., & Guimarães Pereira, Â. (2015). Indicators for promoting and monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation - Report from the Expert Group on Policy Indicators for Responsible Research and Innovation. European Commission - Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.

Vinagre Fernandez, M. R. (2019). Aplicación del análisis de redes sociales y la técnica AHP al desarrollo de indicadores para monitorizar la educación para la ciencia en la política científica española [Universitat Politècnica de València]. Doi: https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/125064

Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation (R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (eds.)). Wiley. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3

Wiarda, M., van de Kaa, G., Yaghmaei, E., & Doorn, N. (2021). A comprehensive appraisal of responsible research and innovation: From roots to leaves. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121053. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121053

Section
Essays, Reviews & Comments