How the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process Supports a More Responsible and Committed Research and Innovation



Published Dec 19, 2021
Hannia Gonzalez-Urango


This essay is a brief presentation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). It is an interesting framework that the European Union has been building around science that is more aware of global challenges. It also highlights the usefulness of AHP/ANP as valuable tools to handle the complexities derived from the implementation of a multidimensional concept such as RRI.

How to Cite

Gonzalez-Urango, H. (2021). How the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process Supports a More Responsible and Committed Research and Innovation . International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 13(3).


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 494 | PDF Downloads 241



Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI, AHP, ANP

Corona-Sobrino, C., García-Melón, M., Poveda-Bautista, R., & Gonzalez-Urango, H. (2020). Closing the gender gap at academic conferences : A tool for monitoring and assessing academic events. PLoS ONE, 15(12), 1–23. Doi:

García-Melón, M., Gómez-Navarro, T., Gonzalez-Urango, H., & Corona-Sobrino, C. (Forthcoming.). Adapting RRI public engagement indicators to the Spanish scientific and innovation context. A participatory methodology based on AHP and Content Analysis. Central European Journal of Operations Research.

Gonzalez-Urango, Hannia García-Melón, M., Monsonís Payá, I., Otero-Hermida, P., García Lozano, J. F., Gómez Navarro, T., Miralles, C., & Jiménez Sáez, F. (2020). Propuesta de indicadores para impulsar el diseño de una política orientada al desarrollo de investigación e innovación responsable en España. Doi:

Gonzalez-Urango, H. (2020). A participatory multicriteria approach to evaluate strategic projects for local sustainable development [Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain (2020)]. Doi:

Gonzalez-Urango, H., Mu, E., & García-Melón, M. (2022). Stakeholder engagement and ANP best research practices in sustainable territorial and urban strategic planning. In M. Doumpos, F. A. F. Ferreira, & C. Zopounidis (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Development. Springer International Publishing.

Ishizaka, A., Pearman, C., & Nemery, P. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4767–4784. Doi:

Ligardo-Herrera, I., Gómez-Navarro, T., & Gonzalez-Urango, H. (2019). Application of the ANP to the prioritization of project stakeholders in the context of responsible research and innovation. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 27(3), 679–701. Doi:

Mejlgaard, N., Woolley, R., Bloch, C., Bührer, S., Griessler, E., Jäger, A., Lindner, R., Madsen, E. B., Maier, F., Meijer, I., Peter, V., Stilgoe, J., & Wuketich, M. (2018). A key moment for European science policy. Journal of Science Communication, 17(3), 1–6. Doi:

Monsonís-Payá, I., García-Melón, M., & Lozano, J. F. (2017). Indicators for responsible research and innovation: A methodological proposal for context-based weighting. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12). Doi:

Mu, E., & Pereyra-Rojas, M. (2015). Impact on society versus impact on knowledge: Why Latin American scholars do not participate in Latin American studies. Latin American Research Review, 50(2), 216–238. Doi:

Otero-Hermida, P., & García-Melón, M. (2018). Gender equality indicators for research and innovation from a responsible perspective: The case of Spain. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(9). Doi:

Pereyra-Rojas, M., Mu, E., Gaskin, J., & Lingham, T. (2017). The higher-ed organizational-scholar tension: How scholarship compatibility and the alignment of organizational and faculty skills, values and support affects scholar’s performance and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(MAR), 450. Doi:

Saaty, T. L. (1980). Decision-making for leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill.

Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The Analytic Network Proces. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. Doi:

Strand, R., Spaapen, J., Bauer, M. W., Hogan, E., Revuelta, G., Stagl, S., Paula, L., & Guimarães Pereira, Â. (2015). Indicators for promoting and monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation - Report from the Expert Group on Policy Indicators for Responsible Research and Innovation. European Commission - Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.

Vinagre Fernandez, M. R. (2019). Aplicación del análisis de redes sociales y la técnica AHP al desarrollo de indicadores para monitorizar la educación para la ciencia en la política científica española [Universitat Politècnica de València]. Doi:

Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation (R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (eds.)). Wiley. Doi:

Wiarda, M., van de Kaa, G., Yaghmaei, E., & Doorn, N. (2021). A comprehensive appraisal of responsible research and innovation: From roots to leaves. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121053. Doi:

Essays, Reviews & Comments