In an uncertain economic environment, the decision-making process regarding personal finances relies heavily on personal experience and behavior, and is largely influenced by a variety of psychological and socio-demographic factors. The aim of this paper is to analyze the key factors of the decision-making process regarding financial choices of the population of young adults in the Republic of North Macedonia, and to further explain young people’s motives for the proposed decision and the conditions under which the decision was made. The research was conducted through an AHP-based questionnaire that was distributed to respondents ranging in age from 18 to 35 years. According to the obtained results, the respondents value financial security the most, hence their primary choice is investment in real estate and commodities. Young adults are less inclined to invest, especially in the more complex financial instruments. The developed AHP model will help young people make better, fact-based financial choices.
How to Cite
financial decision-making, personal finance, young population, AHP
Antony, A., & Joseph, A. I. (2017). Influence of behavioural factors affecting investment decision - An AHP analysis. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 16(2), 107-114. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972622517738833
Carlin, B. I., & Robinson, D. T. (2012). Financial education and timely decision support: Lessons from junior achievement American Economic Review, 102(3), 305-308. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.305
Chang, C.-W., Wu, C.-R., Lin, C.-T., & Chen, H.-C. (2007). An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 52(2), 296-307. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2006.11.006
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2010). Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: An experiment. Economic Inquiry, 48(1), 133-146. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00219.x
de Almeida-Filho, A. T., de Lima Silva, D. F., & Ferreira, L. (2020). Financial modelling with multiple criteria decision making: A systematic literature review. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1772021
Escobar, A. L., López, R. R., Guerrero, G. J. E., & Cuadrado, S. E. (2020). Design of strategies for the implementation and management of a complementary monetary system using the SWOT-AHP methodology. Sustainability, 12(17), 1-23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176849
Eurostat (2020). Youth unemployment rate by sex, age and country of birth. Available at: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=yth_empl_100&lang=en (Accessed on: May 20, 2020).
Franek, J., & Kashi, K. (2014). A review and critique of MADM methods and applications in business and management. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 6(2), 180-201. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v6i2.254
Gawlik, R. (2019). Enhancing the work-life balance through AHP modeling of early career decision-making. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(2), 181-194. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v11i2.626
Goyal, P., Kumar, D., & Kumar, V. (2020). Application of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in the area of sustainability: A literature review. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(3), 512-545. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i3.720
Kahneman, D., & Riepe, M. (1998). Aspects of investor psychology. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 52-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1998.409643
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430-454. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3
Khan, A. U., & Ali, Y. (2020). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process methods and their applications: A twenty-year review from 2000 to 2019. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(3), 369-459. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i3.822
Lusardi, A. (2008). U.S. household savings behavior: The role of financial literacy, information and financial education programs. In Foote, C., Goette, L., & Meier, S. (Eds), Policymaking Insights from Behavioral Economics. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 109-149. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w13824
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., MD Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., & Valipour, A. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications - A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 516-571. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2015.1075139
Obeidat, M. S., Qasim, T., & Khanfar, A. (2018). Implementing the AHP multi-criteria decision approach in buying an apartment in Jordan. Journal of Property Research, 35(1), 53-71. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2017.1413588
OECD (2020). Financial literacy of adults in South East Europe. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/finance/Financial-Literacy-of-Adults-in-South-East-Europe.pdf
(Accessed on: May 18, 2020).
OECD INFE (2011). Measuring financial literacy: Core questionnaire. In Measuring financial literacy: Questionnaire and guidance notes for conducting an internationally comparable survey of financial literacy. Paris: OECD. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9csfs90fr4-en
Pradhan, S., Olfati, M. & Patel, G. (2019). Integrations and applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process with Data Envelopment Analysis - A literature review. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(2), 228-268. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v11i2.632
Ryan, J. S. & Ryan, C. (2015). Managing your personal finances, 7th Edition. Cengage Learning.
Roy, P. K., & Shaw, K. (2021). A credit scoring model for SMEs using AHP and TOPSIS. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1-20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2425
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 32(7), 841-855. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841
Saaty, T. L. (2012). Decision-making for leaders. The Analytic Hierarchy Process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T.L., & Kearns, K.P. (1991). Analytical planning: The organization of systems. The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, Vol. IV. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L., & Peniwati, K. (2007). Group decision-making: Drawing out and reconciling differences. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Sato, Y. (2009). How to measure human perception in survey questionnaires. International Journal of Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1(2), 64-82. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v1i2.31
Spectrum Financial Resources (2021). Personal financial planning questionnaire,
(Accessed on: January 20, 2020)
Steuer, R. E., & Na, P. (2003). Multiple criteria decision-making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(3), 496-515. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00774-9
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Wu, W., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Ergu, D. (2012). Improved AHP group decision-making for investment strategy selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(2), 299-316. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.680520
Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2013). Multicriteria decision systems for financial problems. TOP, 21(2), 241-261. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-013-0279-7
Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M., & Niklis, D. (2018). Financial decision support: An overview of developments and recent trends. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 6(1-2), 63-76. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-018-0078-3
Zopounidis, C., Galariotis, E., Doumpos, M., Sarri, S., & Andriosopoulos, K. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-aiding for finance: An updated bibliographic survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(2), 339-348. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.032
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.