BEST SHARIA BANK IN INDONESIA: AN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) APPROACH
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2618-7101
Elok Vilantika
Fatmawati Sholichah
Zainal Arifin
Abstract
This study aims to determine the performance of Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia using the following assessment criteria: capital, asset quality, efficiency, liquidity, Sharia Conformity & Profitability (SCnP), and the Maqasid Index. The sample includes the five best Sharia banks in Indonesia. All the data are obtained based on the annual reports of each bank taken from the bank's websites in 2019. Data were analyzed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. This tool helps make decisions from several alternative choices of sharia bank institutions. The results show that Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Bank Syariah Mandiri, and BRI Syariah are the three best performing Sharia banks in 2019.
How to Cite
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Sharia bank performance, SCnP, Maqasid Index, Analytical Hierarchy Process
Ahsan, M. K. (2016). Measuring financial performance based on CAMEL: A study on selected Islamic banks in Bangladesh. Asian Business Review, 6(1), 47-56. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v6i1.803
Al Ghifari, M., Handoko, L. H., & Yani, E. A. (2015). Analysis of Sharia banking performance in Indonesia and Malaysia with the Maqashid Index approach. Journal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 3(2), 47-66. Doi: https://doi.org/10.46899/jeps.v3i2.160
Antonio, M. S., Sanrego, Y. D., & Taufiq, M. (2012). An Analysis of Islamic banking performance: Maqashid Index implementation in Indonesia and Jordania. Journal of Islamic Finance, 1(1), 012-029.
Apriani, N., Kusnendi, & Firmansyah. (2018). Implementation of good governance business Sharia (GGBS) and its implications for Sharia Conformity and Profitability (SCnP) financial performance in Sharia commercial banks in Indonesia. Review of Islamic Economics and Finance (RIEF), 1(1), 1-10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/rief.v1i1.23741
Bashatweh, D. A. D., & Ahmed, P. E. Y. (2020). Financial performance evaluation of the commercial banks in Jordan: Based on the CAMELS framework. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 985-994.
Bateni, L., Vakilifard, H., & Asghari, F. (2014). The influential factors on capital adequacy ratio in Iranian banks. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(11), 108-116. Doi: 10.5539/ijef.v6n11p108
Bedoui, M. H. e. (2012). Shari'a-based ethical performance measurement framework. Chair for Ethics and Financial Norms.
Bedoui, H., & Walid, M. (2013). Islamic bank performance and Maqashid Al Shariah. Paper presented at 9th Asia-Pasific Economics Association Conference, di Osaka, Jepang, 27-28.
Djuwita, D. (2019). The influence of Sharia compliance and Islamic corporate governance on financial performance of Sharia commercial bank. Al-Amwal: Jurnal Edonomi dan Perbankan Syari'ah, 11(2), 205-220. Doi: 10.24235/amwal.v11i2.4072
Grant CR, Pradata NE, Muljosantoso R. 2017. Islamic finance and markets – Indonesia’ (gettingthedealthrough.com, September 2017) accessed 28 Oct 2019.
Hartono, S., & Sobari, A. (2017). Sharia Maqashid Index as a measuring performance of Islamic banking: A more holistic approach. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(2), 193-201. Doi: 10.22495/cocv14i2c1p5
Islami, T. u., & Ashrafuzzaman, M. (2015). A comparative study of Islamic and conventional banking in Bangladesh: Camel analysis. Journal of Business and Technology (Dhaka), X(1), 73-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3329/jbt.v10i1.26907
Kouser, R., & Saba, I. (2012). Gauging the financial performance of banking sector using CAMEL model: Comparison of conventional, mixed and pure Islamic banks in Pakistan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics (82).
Kuppusamy, M., Saleh, A. S., & Samudhram, A. (2010). Measurement of Islamic banks performance using a Shariah Conformity and Profitablity model. Review of Islamic Economics and Finance (RIEF), 12(2), 35-48.
Lesmana, S., & Haron, M. H. (2019). Maqasid Shariah based performance of Islamic banks, Islamic corporate governance, and contingency theory: A theoretical framework. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business (IJAFB), 4(24), 70-86.
Mega, S., Isni, A., & Taufiq, M. (2019). Performance of Indonesian Islamic banks based on Maqasid Shariah Index: Stakeholder theory perspective. Eurasia: Economics & Business, 7(25), 18-27. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18551/econeurasia.2019-07
Mohammed, M. O., Razak, D.A. (2008). The performance measures of Islamic banking based on the Maqashid framework. Paper of IIUM International Accounting Conference (INTAC IV) held at Putra Jaya Marroitt, 1-17.
Nugraha, E., Nugroho, L., Lindra, C. N., & Sukiati, W. (2020). Maqashid Sharia implementation in Indonesia and Bahrain. Etikonomi, 19(1), 155-168. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v19i1.14655
Prasetyowati, L. A., & Handoko, L. H. (2016). Pengukuran Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah dengan Maqasid Index dan Sharia Conformity and Profitability (SCnP). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Islam, 4(2), 107-130. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35836/jakis.v4i2.22
Ramdhoni, M. I., & Fauzi, F. A. (2020). Islamic banks performance: An assessment using Sharia Maqashid Index, Sharia Conformity and Profitability and CAMELS. International Journal of Applied Business Research, 2(1), 15-30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35313/ijabr.v2i01.79
Ratnaputri, W. (2013). The analysis of Islamic bank financial performance by using Camel and Shariah Conformity and Profitability (SCNP). Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 4(2), 215-226.
Razak, Abd Hakim Abd. 2015. The fundamentals of Islamic banking and finance: A prologue. EJIF – European Journal of Islamic Finance. 2, 1-11
Rusydiana, A. S., & Parisi, S. A. (2016). The measurement of Islamic bank performance: A study using Maqasid Index and profitability. Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business, 4(1), 001-014. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14421/grieb.2016.041-01
Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: a skill building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Shahhoseini, M. A., Khassehkhan, S., & Shanyani, N. (2012). Identifying key performance indicators of an Iranian Islamic bank based on BSC and AHP. Journal of American Science, 8(1s), 64-73.
Suresh, D. C., & Bardastani, M. M. (2016). Financial performance of selected conventional And Islamic banks in kingdom of Bahrain – A CAMEL ranking based approach. European Journal of Economic, Law and Politics (ELP), 1(1), 24-59. Doi: https://doi.org/10.19044/elp.v3no1a2
Tabash, M. I. (2017). Critical challenges affecting Islamic banking growth in India using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Banks and Bank Systems, 12(3), 27-34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(3).2017.02
Tarique, Islam, Mohamed, Razak, & Hamdan. (2020). Constructing a Maqasid (objective) based performance measurement index for Islamic banks. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(2), 328-354. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i2.770
Wulandari, M. V., Suryana, & Utami, S. A. (2019). Determinant of Non-Performing Financing in Indonesia Islamic Bank. The 2nd International Conference on Islamic Economics, Business, and Philanthropy (ICIEBP) Theme: “Sustainability and Socio Economic Growth”, KnE Social Sciences, 453-468. Doi: 10.18502/kss.v3i13.4223
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.