Published Apr 24, 2019
Gabriella Marcarelli
Paola Mancini


Location, well-qualified teachers, leaving score and academic performance are the main factors associated with parents' high school choices. This paper aims to provide students and their parents with a helpful tool for synthesizing these elements. By focusing on a small Italian town, we analyze Eduscopio and ScuolainChiaro’s data concerning high schools’ characteristics and students’ performances, and apply the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in order to derive the ranking of high schools taking into account three criteria: the students' performance at school, their academic performance and the school’s characteristics (such as the number of students per class and per teacher). The results from the AHP procedure using only school performances and characteristics highlight that the classic lyceum has the best performance and the scientific lyceums rank second, albeit rather close to the other lyceums. Entering the academic performance factor into the model changes the ranking of preferences in favor of the scientific lyceum, whose value is slightly higher than the classic one, and decreases the values of the other lyceums and technical high schools. This is due to the excellent academic performance of those who leave scientific schools, mostly in terms of credits at the end of the first year and average exam scores.


How to Cite

Marcarelli, G., & Mancini, P. (2019). HIGH SCHOOL CHOICE: HOW DO PARENTS MAKE THEIR CHOICE?. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v11i1.633


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 878 | PDF Downloads 232



School choice, school performance, academic performance, AHP, Eduscopio

Agasisti T., Bonomi F., Sibiano P. (2014). Measuring the “managerial” efficiency of public schools: a case study in Italy. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(2), 120–140. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2013-0032.

Agasisti T., Vittadini G. (2012). Regional economic disparities as determinants of students' achievement in Italy. Research in Applied Economics, 4(2), 33¬–54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5296/rae.v4i2.1316
Agasisti T., Murtinu S. (2012). Perceived competition and performance in Italian secondary school: new evidence from OECD-PISA 2006. British Educational Research Journal, 38(5), 841–858. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.588314

Anderson, K. J., & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward an understanding of parents' decision making. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 311-323. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.100.5.311-323

Bauch, P. A., & Goldring, E. B. (1996). Parent involvement and teacher decision making in urban high schools of choice. Urban Education, 31(4), 403-431. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/004208599603100404

Bordignon M., Carapella P. and Turati G. (2017). Eduscopio: le determinanti dell'accesso all'informazione, Programma Education FGA Working Paper, n.56, Fondazione Giovanni Agnelli.

Burgess S., Greaves E., Vignoles A. and Wilson D. (2014). What parents want: school preferences and school choice. The Economic Journal, 125, 1262–1289. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12153

Giambona F. and Porcu M. (2018). School size and students’ achievement. empirical evidences from PISA survey data. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 64(C), 66-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.12.007

Goldhaber, D.D. (1999). School choice: An examination of the empirical evidence on achievement, parental decision making, and equity. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 16-25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x028009016

Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J. F., Rivkin, S. G., & Branch, G. F. (2007). Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5-6), 823-848. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.09.014

Lauer C. (2003). Family background, cohort and education: A French-German comparison based on a multivariate ordered probit model of educational attainment. Labour Economics, 10, 231–251. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-5371(03)00007-1

Masci C., Witte K. D., Agasisti T. (2018). The influence of school size, principal characteristics and school management practices on educational performance: An efficiency analysis of Italian students attending middle schools. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 52–69. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2016.09.009

Masci C, Ieva F, Agasisti T, Paganoni AM. (2016). Bivariate multilevel models for the analysis of mathematics and reading pupils’ achievements. Journal of Applied Statistics, 44(7), 1296-1317. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2016.1201799.

Mumtaz U., Ali Y., Petrillo A., Fabio De Felice F. (2018). Identifying the critical factors of green supply chain management: Environmental benefits in Pakistan, Science of the Total Environment, 640-641, 144-152. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.231

Pandolfini V. (2013). Public or private education? Parents' choice between actual and potential pluralism, Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(2), 189-211.

Saaty T.L. and Vargas L.G. (1982). The logic of priorities: Applications in business, energy, health, and transportation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff. Reprinted in Paperback. (1991). Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

Shneider B. and Coleman J.S. (2018). Parents, their children and schools. New York: Routledge, New York.

Seitsinger, A. M. (2019). Examining the effect of family engagement on middle and high school students’ academic achievement and adjustment. The Wiley Handbook of Family, School, and Community Relationships in Education. John Wiley and Sons Inc. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119083054.ch8

Seitsinger A. and Brand S. (2011). The effect of home-school-community partnership on US high school students: a large scale examination of the effects of family engagement in education on US high school students’ academic adjustment and achievement, Proceedings of 8th ERNAPE Conference, Milan. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119083054.ch8

Taylor, C. (2018). Geography of the 'new' education market: Secondary school choice in England and Wales. New York: Routledge.

Saaty T.L. and Vargas L.G. (1982). The logic of priorities: Applications in business, energy, health, and transportation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff. Reprinted in Paperback. (1991). Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

Wespieser K., Durbin B, and Sims D. (2015). School choice: The parent view. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.