Published Feb 28, 2018
Mustafa Özdemir Müjgan Sa??r Özdemir


Meeting the need for qualified staff in the field of air traffic control depends primarily on selection of appropriate candidates among many applicants. The selection of competent air traffic controllers, who play a vital role in the air traffic system, is of critical importance and is usually conducted through multi-stage examinations. It is also important to use correct methods in the selection process in order to identify the most suitable candidates. In particular, the application of subjective examinations, such as interviews in a standard way, and determination and standardization of criteria can assist in selecting the right candidates. Within this context, the student selection process in an air traffic control department is investigated, with the aim of supporting the interview examination through the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The criteria weighting is determined by expert opinion. Thirty-nine candidates are ranked according to the AHP, with the current and proposed rankings being compared. As a result, the ranking has changed significantly with the proposed approach.

How to Cite

Özdemir, M., & Sa??r Özdemir, M. (2018). THE USE OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR ADMISSION TO AN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEPARTMENT. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(1).


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 858 | PDF Downloads 203



Analytic Hierarchy Process, air traffic control, interview

Al-Harbi, K.M.A.S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 19-27. Doi:

Altunoluk, T., Özpeynirci, Ö., Kazanço?lu, Y., & Y?lmaz, R. (2010). Comparative analysis of multicriteria decision making methods for postgraduate student selection. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 40, 1-15.

An, S., Kim, G., & Kang, K. (2007). A case-based reasoning cost estimating model using experience by Analytic Hierarchy Process. Building and Environment, 42(2007), 2573-2579. Doi:

Bogdanovic, D., & Miletic, S. (2014). Personnel evaluation and selection by multicriteria decision making method, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 48(3), 179-196.

European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL). (1998). Integrated task and job analysis of air traffic controllers, Belgium, Brussels: EUROCONTROL.

European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL). (2010). Human performance in air traffic management safety. Belgium, Brussels: EUROCONTROL.

Gibney, R., & Shang, J. (2007). Decision making in academia: A case of the dean selection process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 1030-1040. Doi:

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2007). Procedures for air navigation services air traffic management (Doc 4444). Canada, Montreal: ICAO.

Jou, R.C., Kuo, C.W., & Tang, M.L. (2013). A study of job stress and turnover tendency among air traffic controllers: The mediating effects of job satisfaction, Transportation Research Part E, 57 (2013), 95-10. Doi:

Kasim, M., Ramli, R., Ibrahim, H., Ghazali, M., Kamal, F., & Vikneswari S. (2012). Prioritization of criteria in teacher-candidate selection process by a pairwise comparison method, Knowledge Management International Conference. Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

Kwong, C.K., & Bai, H. (2002). A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13(5), 367-377.

Norddin, N.I., Ibrahim, K., & Aziz, A.H. (2012). Selecting new lecturers using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). 2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE). Langkawi, Malaysia. Doi: 10.1109/ICSSBE.2012.6396585

Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. Doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Saaty, T.L. (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176. Doi:

Saaty, T.L., & Sagir, M. (2009). Extending the measurement of tangibles to intangibles. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8(01), 7-27. Doi:

Swiercz, P., & Ezzedeen, S. (2001). From sorcery to science: AHP, a powerful new tool for executive selection. HR. Human Resource Planning, 24(3), 15-26.

Ta?k?n, H., Üstün, Ü., & Delikta?, D. (2013). Fuzzy MCDM approach for oral examination in erasmus student selection process. DPU? Fen Bilimleri Enstitu?su? Dergisi, 32, 21-40.

Taylor, F., Ketcham, A., & Hoffman, D. (1998). Personnel evaluation with AHP. Management Decision, 36, 679-685. Doi:

Vaidya, O.S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic Hierarchy Process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. Doi:

Wiegmann, D.A., & Shappell, S.A. (2001). Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: Application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72(11), 1006-1016.