Visual Management for Decision Analysis
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Visual management has been recently recognized as an excellent way to convey decisions in a clear and convincing way. AHP already used visual techniques for evaluating the pairwise comparisons and performing a sensibility analysis. In this paper, we introduce a new descriptive tool GAIA that can be coupled with AHP in order to visualize the entire problem on a unique plane.
How to Cite
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Visual management, GAIA, descriptive tool
Dung, T., N. Luan, et al. (2016). The analytic approach in green supplier selection: a literature review. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(11), 6754-6762.
Forman, E. and S. Gass (2001). The Analytic Hierarchy Process – An exposition. Operations Research, 49(4), 469-486. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231
Golden, B., E. Wasil, et al. (1989). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and studies. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-6_3
Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211-228. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
Ishizaka, A. and A. Labib (2009). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: benefits and limitations. OR Insight, 22(4), 201–220. Doi: 10.1057/ori.2009.10
Ishizaka, A., S. Siraj, et al. (2016). Which energy mix for the UK? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA-AHP visualisation tool. Energy 95, 602–611. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.009
Kumar, S. and O. Vaidya (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Liberatore, M. and R. Nydick (2008). The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 194-207. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001
Mareschal, B. and J.-P. Brans (1988). Geometrical representations for MCDA. European Journal of Operational Research, 34(1), 69-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90456-0
Nemery, P., A. Ishizaka, et al. (2012). Enriching descriptive information in ranking and sorting problems with visualizations techniques. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(2), 130-147. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465661211242778
Omkarprasad, V. and K. Sushil (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Saaty, T. and E. Forman (1992). The Hierarchon: A Dictionary of Hierarchies. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5443-0_11
Shim, J. (1989). Bibliography research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 23(3), 161-167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(89)90013-X
Sipahi, S. and M. Timor (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775-808. Doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043920
Siraj, S., L. Mikhailov, et al. (2013). PriEsT: an interactive decision support tool to estimate priorities from pairwise comparison judgments. International Transactions in Operational Research, 22(2), 217–235. Doi: 10.1111/itor.12054
Vargas, L. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 2-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process: a survey of the method and its applications. Interface, 16(4), 96-108. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.