Published Dec 21, 2016
Giridhar B Kamath Rakesh Naik Shiva Prasad


To improve a firm’s supply chain performance it is essential to have a vendor evaluation process to be able to showcase an organization’s success in the present aggressive market. Hence, the process of evaluating the vendor is a crucial task of the purchasing executives in supply chain management. The objective of this research is to propose a methodology to evaluate the vendors for a steel pipe manufacturing firm in Gujarat, India. For the purpose of the study, the Analytical Hierarchy Process was used to evaluate the best raw material vendor for this company. Multiple qualitative and quantitative criteria are involved in the vendor evaluation process.  To solve the complex problem of vendor evaluation, a tradeoff between these multi-criteria is important. The outcomes indicated that the AHP technique makes it simpler to assign weights for the different criteria for evaluating the vendor. Research findings showed that quality is the most important criterion followed by delivery, cost and vendor relationship management.


How to Cite

Kamath, G. B., Naik, R., & Prasad, S. (2016). A VENDOR’S EVALUATION - USING AHP FOR AN INDIAN STEEL PIPE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v8i3.460


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 1970 | PDF Downloads 273



cost, delivery, quality, vendor evaluation, vendor relationship management

Alsuwehri, Y. N. (2011). Supplier evaluation and selection by using the analytic hierarchy process approach. Engineering Management Field Project, Graduate School of Science Doctoral dissertation, The University of Kansas.

Coulter, E., Coakley, J., & Sessions, J. (2006). The analytic hierarchy process: A tutorial for use in prioritizing forest road investments to minimize environmental effects. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 17(2), 51–70.

Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5–17.

Ghodsypour, S. H. & O’Brien, C. (1998). A decision support system for vendor selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programing. International Journal of Production Economics 56-57(1),199-212. Doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00009-1.x.

Giunipero, L. C. & Pearcy, D. H. (2000). World class purchasing skills: an empirical investigation. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(3), 4–13. Doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2000.tb00081.x

Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16-24. Doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009. x.

Imeri, S. (2013). Key performance criteria for vendor evaluation - A literature review. Journal of Management Research and Practice, 5(2),63–75.

John, K., Baby, V. Y., & Mangalathu, G. S. (2003). Vendor evaluation and rating using analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, 2(3), 447–455.

Kannan, V. & Tan, K. (2002). Supplier selection and assessment: Their impact on business performance. The Journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply, 38(4), 11–21. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2002.tb00139.x.

Mowshowitz, A. (1997). Virtual organization. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 30–37. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/260750.260759.

Saaty, T. L. & Tran, L. T. (2007). On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), 962–975. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.022

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00137918308956077.

Saaty, T. L., & Hu, G. (1998). Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematics Letters, 11(4), 121–125.

Sonawane, S., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2015). Evaluation of suppliers’ performance–Quality aspect using AHP & system dynamics techniques. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(6), 2124–2128.

Tahriri, F., Osman, M., Ali, A., Yusuff, R., & Esfandiary, A. (2008). AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 1(2), 54–76. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.v1n2.

Tam, M. C. Y. & Tummala, V. M. R. (2001). An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 29(2), 171–182. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6.
Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European journal of operational research, 50(1), 2–18. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R.

Yahya, S., & Kingsman, B. (1999). Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: A case study using the analytic hierarchy process method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(9), 916-930. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3010189.

Yu, X., & Jing, S. (2004). A decision model for supplier selection considering trust. Chinese Business Review, 3(6), 15–20. ISSN1537-1506.

Yusuff, R. M., Yee, K. P., & Hashmi, M. S. J. (2001). A preliminary study in potential use of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to predict advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) implementation. Robotics and computer integrated manufacturing, 17(1),421–427. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(01)00016-3