The purpose of this paper is to provide an integrated approach that prioritizes organizational performance measures and critical success factors towards the strategic objectives and initiatives of a firm. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) pair-wise comparisons and hierarchic composition technique is used to prioritize the key performance indicators (KPIs) and the key result indicators (KRIs) as well as the critical success factors (CSFs) of the organization within the frame of a single hierarchy. The new model presented in the paper will be more suitable for dealing with the problem than the others which are available. The application of the suggested model will enable staff to more closely align their daily activities to the strategic objectives of the firm.Â The suggested approach allows for a wide applicability to different types of organizations (business, nonprofit, public) and its use could significantly improve resource allocation and the overall performance in organizations.
How to Cite
Performance measures, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Key performance indicators, Key result indicators, Critical success factors
Barr, S. (2014).Practical performance measurement: Using the PuMP blueprint for fast, easy and engaging KPIs. The PuMP Press.
Chen, T. (1999). Critical success factors for various strategies in the banking industry. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(2), 83-91. Doi:
Chiu, C.R., et al. (2014). The performance of commercial banks based on a context-dependent range-adjusted measure model. International Transactions in Operational Research, 21(5), 761-778. Doi: 10.1111/itor.12069
Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1988). Fuzzy sets and systems. New York: Academic Press.
Expert Choice (2002). Expert Choice 2000.Pittsburgh, PA: Expert Choice Inc.
Forman, E. and Gass, S. (2001). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: An exposition. Operations Research, 49, 469-486. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231
Golden, B., Wasil, E. and Harker, P. (1989).The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and studies. Berlin: Springer.
Ho, C, and Zhu, D. (2004). Performance measurement of Taiwanâ€™s commercial banks. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(5), 425-434. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400410545897
Ishizaka, A, and Labib, A. (2009). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations. OR Insight, 22, 201-220.Doi: 10.1057/ori.2009.10
Ishizaka, A, and Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14336-14345. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton D.P. (1996).The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press. Doi:10.1016/S0737-6782(97)89410-6
Liberatore, M. and Nydick, R. (2003). Decision technology: Modeling, software, and applications. New York, NY: Wiley.
McGinley, P. (2012).Decision analysis software survey. OR/MS Today, 39.
Parmenter, D., (2015). Key Performance Indicators: Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs, Third Edition. Wiley. Doi: 10.1002/9781119019855
Saaty, T.L. (1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00137918308956077
Saaty, T.L. (2008), Decision-making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Science, 1(1), 83-98. Doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L. (2000).Models, methods, concepts and applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Salmeron,J.L. and Herrero,I. (2005). An AHP-based methodology to rank critical success factors of executive information systems. Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces, 28(1), 1-12. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2004.09.002
Shahin,A. and Mahbod,M. (2007). Prioritization of key performance indicators: An integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(3), 226-240.
Spitzer, D. (2007).Transforming performance measurement: Rethinking the way we measure and drive organizational success. New York: AMACOM.
Suryadi, K. (2007). Key performance indicators measurement model based on AHP and trend-comparative dimension in higher education institution, ISAHP 2007, Vina Del Mar, Chile.
Teker S., Teker D. and Kent O. (2011).Measuring commercial banks performances in Turkey: A proposed model. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 1(3), 97-112.
Vaidya, O. and Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 1-29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.