A MULTI-CRITERIA JOB EVALUATION METHOD FOR A STATE BANK
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Wage management is an important task which affects a firm’s productivity in the short term and the consistency of the firm’s activities in long term. If an organization fails to establish a fair wage policy among the personnel, conflict is inevitable in the organization. A fair wage policy can be achieved by job evaluation, which is a technique used to determine the relative importance of all jobs in an organization. Jobs are evaluated with respect to ability, responsibility, effort, and job condition factors etc. which make it a multi-criteria problem for organizations. In this study, a job evaluation methodology is developed for a state bank in Turkey. The relative importance of the evaluation criteria which is then used to grade jobs with respect to one another by a Liberatore scale is determined by an Analytic Network Process (ANP) model. This new methodology has a positive effect on competence and performance management systems.
How to Cite
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Job Evaluation, Analytic Network Process, Multi Criteria Decision Making, Banking.
Chen, S. H., Lee, H. T. (2007). Performance evaluation model for project managers using managerial practices. International Journal of Project Management, 25(6), 543–551.
DaÄŸdeviren, M., Akay, D. and Kurt, M. (2004a). Analytical Hierarchy Process for job evaluation and application. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 19, 131-138.
DaÄŸdeviren, M., Akay, D. and Kurt, M. (2004b). Job evaluation, use of goal programming technique at determine factor degree points. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 19, 89-95.
Eraslan, E. and Arıkan, B. (2004). Determination of wages using the point method, seniority and success: An application in internal production department of a manufacturing facility. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 19, 139-150.
Eraslan, E., Atalay, K. D., Dagdeviren, M., Aksakal, E. (2013). Using fuzzy wage management system in heavy industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 7 – 13.
Keeney, R. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. London: Harvard University Press.
Keeney, R.L. & Raifa, H. (1976). Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
Liberatore, M.J., Nydick, R.L., Sanchez, P.M. (1992). The evaluation of research papers. Interfaces, 22(2), 92-100.
Neathley, F. (1994). Job evaluation in the 1990s. London: Industrial Relations Services.
Saaty, T. (2000). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, USA: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T.L. (2001). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, USA: RWS Publications.
Secme N. Y., Bayrakdaroglu, A., Kahraman, C., (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699–11709.
Spyridakos, A., Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D., Skouris, A. (2001). Multicriteria job evaluation for large organizations. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 375-387.
Metal Industry Job Grouping System. (1996). Ä°stanbul: Turkish Metal Industrialists Union Publication, Åžahinkaya Press.
Xing, L., Li, Y. and Ma, L. (2008). Study on the application of Point Method in job evaluation. Proceedings of the 7th Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, China, 2835-2839.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.