In this article, we propose a method of decision making in multi-criteria problems given an interval uncertainty of the estimates given by the subject in reference to the importance of one criterion over another and various alternatives for each criterion. The method is the development of the deterministic process of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, which uses deterministic point estimates of the importance of criteria and alternatives for each criterion for decision making in multi-criteria problems. While in the standard Analytic Hierarchy Process the values of global priorities corresponding to different alternatives are deterministic and unambiguous, in the interval process developed in this article the global priorities and alternatives are interval and uncertain. If in the standard deterministic Analytic Hierarchy Process the best alternative is selected by the maximum value of the global priority, then, to select the best interval alternative, here we introduce a criterion corresponding to the maximum values of the lower and upper boundaries of the intervals of global priorities of the alternatives. The application of the proposed method is demonstrated by a specific example.Â
interval, uncertainty, estimates, decision making, analytic hierarchy process
Eskandari, H., and Rabelo, L. (2007). Handling uncertainty in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A stochastic approach. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 6(01), 177âˆ’189.
Haines, L.M., 1998 Haines, L. M. (1998). A statistical approach to the Analytic Hierarchy Process with interval judgements. (I). Distributions on feasible regions. European Journal of Operational Research, 110(1), 112âˆ’125.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (2001). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lipovetsky, S., and Tishler, A. (1999). Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 114(1), 153âˆ’164.
Madera, A.G. (2010). Modeling and decision making in management. Moscow: LKI.
Madera, A.G. (2014). Risks and chances: Uncertainty, prediction and Evaluation. Moscow: Krasand.
Mikhailov, L. (2004). A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(3), 687âˆ’704.
Mikhailov, L., Didehkhani, H., Sadi-Nezhad, S. (2011). Weighted prioritization models in the fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making,10(4), 1âˆ’14.
Podinovski, V.V. (2007). Interval articulation of superiority and precise elicitation of priorities. European Journal of Operational Research,180, 406 â€“ 417.
Ross, S. (1993). Introduction to probability models, 5thed. New York: Academic Press.
Saaty, T.L. (2001). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Salo, A.A., and HÃ¤mÃ¤lÃ¤inen R.P. (1995). Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research,82, 458 â€“ 475.
Wang Y.-M., Yang J.-B., Xu D.-L.(2005). Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices. Applied Mathematics and Computation,167, 252 â€“ 273.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.