The purpose of this paper is to show how some of the main results existing in the insurance service quality, as a huge service sector, utilizing SERVQUAL scale and ANP model can be effectively used in scientifically ranking strategies instead of the traditional models, which is unfortunately more popular in ranking the branches of insurance companies .This approach is used to show how the ranking decisions changes as a function of service quality utilizing ANP model. This study evaluated the quality of services of DANA insurance company branches to measure policy holdersâ€™ views toward current level and expected level of quality. The standard questionnaire â€œSERVQUALâ€, emphasizing on measuring the gap between the level of current and Expected quality was used and the proposed algorithm utilized the analytic network process (ANP), which allows Â measurement of the dependency among the quality dimensions, to rank the branches.
The results showed difference between policy holders â€™expectations and current level of quality of services in all dimensions of service quality. According to the ANP limit super matrix it was revealed that there was a significant difference between the proposed ranking approach and the traditional one.
ANP, SERVQUAL, service industry
technical and vocational colleges using SERVQUAL model. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5285 – 5289.
BMI Annual Report (2011). Rate of insurance industry in IRI GNP. Journal of
Economics, 2324 (12). (in Persian)
Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233–247.
Capar, N., Kotabe, M., (2003).The relationship between international diversification and
performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 345–355.
Chung S.H., Lee A.H.L., Pearn W.L., (2005). Analytic network process (ANP) approach
for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of
Production Economics, 96, 15–36.
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis: theory,
methodology, and applications, references and DEA-solver software. Boston: Kluwer
Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrogtt M, (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the
art surveys. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Springer Verlag.
Foroughi Abari A.A, Yarmohammadian M.H, Esteki.M, (2011). Assessment of quality of
education a non-governmental university via SERVQUAL model. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2299–2304.
Gaglianoo, K. B. & Hathcot, J. (1994). Customer expectation and perceptions of service
quality in apparel retailing .Journal of Service Marketing, 8(1), 66-69.
Gale BT. (1994). Managing customer value: Creating quality and service that customers
can see. New York: The Free Press.
Hakyeon Leea, Chulhyun Kim, (2012). A DEA-SERVQUAL Approach to Measurement
and Benchmarking of Service Quality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40,
756 – 76.
Jabonoun, N. & Al Tamimi, A. H. (2003). Measuring perceived service quality at UAE
commercial banks. International Journal of Quality &Reliability Management, 20, 458-
Kang, H. & Bradley, G. (2002). Measuring the performance of it services an Assessment
of SERVQUAL. International of Accounting Information System, 3(4), 151-164.
Ladhari R. (2009), A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International
Journal of Quality Service Science, 1, 172-198.
Lapin L. (1990). Probability and statistics for modern engineering. Boston: PWS-KENT
Lee J.W., Kim S.H., (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for
interdependent information system project selection. Computers and Operations
Research, 27, 367–382.
Meade, L. M., & Sarkis, J. (1998). Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain
management systems using the analytic network process. Logistics and Transportation
Review, 34(2), 201–215.
Meade L.M., Sarkis J., (1999). Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile
manufacturing processes: an analytical network approach. International Journal of
Production Research, 37, 241–261.
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for
measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 65, 12-40.
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality
and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. & Berry, L. L. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of
the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420- 450.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. & Berry, L. L. (1994). Alternative scale for measuring
service quality: a comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria.
Journal of Retailing, 70, 207-230.
Parente .R, Byeongyong P.C, Arjen H.L, Slangen S.K, (2010). Distribution system choice
in a service industry: An analysis of international insurance firms operating in the United
State. Journal of International Management, 16, 275–287.
Ramon A. C., Munoz-L.F., Sanchez .J.-Fernandez B, Francisco J. Liebana C. (2012). A
model for the integration of e-financial services questionnaires with SERVQUAL scales
under fuzzy linguistic modeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 11535–11547.
Saaty, T.L., Khouja, M.W., (1976). A measure of world influence. Journal of Peace
Saaty. T. L, (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1996). The analytic network process-decision making with dependence and
feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Saaty, R. W. (2003). Decision making in complex environment: The analytic hierarchy
process (AHP) for decision making and the analytic network process (ANP) for decision
making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh: Super Decisions.
Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and applications of the analytic network process: Decision
making with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic network process:
Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities,
costs and risks. New York: Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC.
Sarkis, J. (1999). A methodological framework for evaluating environmentally conscious
manufacturing programs. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36(4), 793–810.
Sekitani, K., & Takahashi, I. (2001). A unified model and analysis for AHP and ANP.
Journal of the Operations, Research Society of Japan, 44(1), 67–89.
Tseng, M. L., Lin, Y. H., Chiu, A. S. F., & Liao. H.(2008). Using FANP approach on
selection of competitive priorities based on cleaner production implementation: A case
study in PCB manufacturer, Taiwan. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, 10(1),
Whitaker, R., (2007), Validation examples of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and
Analytic Network Process. Mathematical and Computer modeling, 46, 840–859.
Yucenur. G.N. & Vayvay. O. & Demirel N.Ç, (2011). Supplier selection problem in
global supply chains by AHP and ANP approaches under fuzzy environment.
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56, 823–833.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.