AN INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF INDUSTRY 4.0 MATURITY LEVEL
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Zeynep Tuğçe Kalender
Can Korkmaz Betül Kaya
Abstract
The ability to adapt to changes in information and communication technologies is essential for all organizations. Companies that fail to correctly perceive the need for these changes and delay their implementation are doomed to disappear. In this context, the term Industry 4.0 is used to refer to digital improvement studies. It aims to increase profitability by reducing production costs without increasing the focus areas of companies. Determining the level of digitalization is as important as completing the digitalization infrastructure to bring Industry 4.0 to life. In this way, companies can determine their current digitalization status and maintain their competitiveness. They can also decide the steps needed to implement Industry 4.0. Currently, there are many methods and models used to determine the level of digitalization. However, this study takes a distinctive approach by aiming to develop an integrated methodology tailored for quantifying Industry 4.0 maturity in companies. To begin, the dimensions used within the Industry 4.0 maturity assessment were extracted from the literature. Then, a focus group approach was utilized by experts to eliminate the unimportant dimensions. Next, Interval-Valued Spherical Fuzzy AHP (IVSF-AHP) was used to determine the importance weights of the determined dimensions. Finally, the Industry 4.0 maturity level of an aviation/defense company was calculated by applying the proposed methodology based on the data collected via the questionnaire. Therefore, this proposed methodology provides a potent instrument for accurately appraising progress in digital transformation, refining strategies, and securing success in an evolving technology-driven environment.
How to Cite
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Industry 4.0, Maturity model, IVSF-AHP
Akdil, K. Y., Ustundag, A., & Cevikcan, E. (2018). Maturity and readiness model for Industry 4.0 strategy. In Ustundag, A., Cevikcan, E., (Eds.), Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation (pp. 61–94). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Akman, G., Boyacı, A. İ., & Kurnaz, S. (2022). Selecting the suitable e-commerce marketplace with neutrosophic Fuzzy AHP and EDAS methods from seller's perspective in the context of Covid-19. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 14(3), 1–36. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v14i3.994
Al-Ali, M., & Marks, A. (2022). A digital maturity model for the education enterprise. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 26(2), 47–58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2021.1978578
Almasbekkyzy, A., Abdikerim, D., Nabi, D., Abdallah, Y. O., & Shehab, E. (2021, April). Digital maturity and readiness model for multiple-case of Kazakhstan large companies. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST), 1-7. Doi: 10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465912
Alsufyani, N., & Gill, A. Q. (2021). A review of digital maturity models from adaptive enterprise architecture perspective: Digital by design. 2021 IEEE 23rd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), 1, 121–130. Doi: http://hdl.handle.net/10453/157937
Aras, A., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation journey guidance: A holistic digital maturity model based on a systematic literature review. Systems, 11(4), 213.
Asdecker, B., & Felch, V. (2018). Development of an Industry 4.0 maturity model for the delivery process in supply chains. Journal of Modelling in Management, 13(4), 840-883. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JM2-03-2018-0042
Aslanova, I. V., & Kulichkina, A. I. (2020). Digital maturity: Definition and model. 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Management Trends and the Digital Economy: from Regional Development to Global Economic Growth” (MTDE 2020) (443-449). Atlantis Press. Doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200502.073
Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96, Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
Ayyildiz, E., & Taskin, A. (2022). A novel spherical fuzzy AHP-VIKOR methodology to determine serving petrol station selection during COVID-19 lockdown: A pilot study for İstanbul. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 83, 101345. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101345
Azevedo, A., & Santiago, S. B. (2019). Design of an assessment Industry 4.0 maturity model: An application to manufacturing company, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Toronto (pp. 208-217). IEOM Society International.
Bandara, O., Vidanagamachchi, K., & Wickramarachchi, R. (2019). A model for assessing maturity of Industry 4.0 in the banking sector, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bangkok, Thailand.
Barry, A.S., Assoul, S., & Souissi, N. (2022). Benchmarking of digital maturity models according to the dimension component. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Batz A., Oleśków-Szłapka J., Stachowiak A., Pawłowski G., & Maruszewska K. (2020). Identification of logistics 4.0 maturity levels in Polish companies—Framework of the model and preliminary research. In Grzybowska K., Awasthi A., & Sawhney R. (Eds.) Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0. EcoProduction (Environmental Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing). (pp. 161-175). Cham: Springer.
Bibby, L. & Dehe, B. (2018). Defining and assessing Industry 4.0 maturity levels – case of the defense sector. Production Planning & Control, 29(12), 1030-1043. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1503355
Branco, I.C., Jesus, F. R., & Oliveria, T. (2019). Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union. Computers in Industry, 107, 22-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.007
Brozzi, R., D’Amico, R. D., Pasetti Monizza, G., Marcher, C., Riedl, M. & Matt, D. (2018). Design of self-assessment tools to measure Industry 4.0 readiness. A methodological approach for craftsmanship SMEs. In Chiabert P., Bouras A., Noël F., Ríos J. (Eds), Product Lifecycle Management to Support Industry 4.0. PLM 2018. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol: 540. Cham: Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01614-2_52
Büyüközkan, G., & Güler, M. (2019). Analysis of companies’ digital maturity by hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM methods. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 38(2), 1-14. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179473
Castro H. F., Carvalho A. R. F., Leal F., & Gouveia H. (2020). Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness of Portuguese companies. In Almeida H., & Vasco J. (Eds), Progress in Digital and Physical Manufacturing: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. (pp. 57-64). Cham: Springer.
Cordes, A. K., & Musies, N. (2021). Accelerating the transformation? The impact of COVID-19 on the digital maturity of retail businesses. IEEE 23rd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) Vol. 1 (pp. 102-110). IEEE.
De Carolis, A., Macchi, M., Negri, E. & Terzi, S. (2017). A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies. In Lödding H., Riedel R., Thoben KD., von Cieminski G., Kiritsis D. (Eds), Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 513. Springer, Cham.
Duleba, S., Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., & Moslem, S. (2021). Interval-valued spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to evaluate public transportation development. Informatica, 32(4), 661-686. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/21-INFOR451
Duncan, R., Eden, R., Woods, L., Wong, I., & Sullivan, C. (2022). Synthesizing dimensions of digital maturity in hospitals: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(3), e32994.
Gajsek, B., Marolt, J., Rupnik, B., Lerher, T., & Sternad, M. (2019). Using maturity model and discrete event simulation for Industry 4.0 implementation. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 3, 488-489. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM18(3)489
Geissbauer, R., Vedsø, J., & Schrauf, S. (2016). A strategist’s guide to Industry 4.0. Strategy and Business, 83, 148-163.
Gökalp, E., ¸Sener, U., & Eren, P. E. (2017). Development of an assessment model for Industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM. In Mas, A., Mesquida, A., O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (Eds.), Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (128–142). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Goumeh, F., & Barforoush, A. A. (2021, March). A digital maturity model for digital banking revolution for Iranian banks. 26th International Computer Conference, Computer Society of Iran (CSICC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Gülseren, A., & Sağbaş A. (2019). Evaluation of digital transformation and digital maturity level in industry from Industry 4.0 perspective [in Turkish: Endüstri 4.0 Perspektifinde Sanayide Dijital Dönüşüm ve Dijital Olgunluk Seviyesinin Değerlendirilmesi]. European Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2, 1-5, Doi: http://dergipark.gov.tr/EJEAS
Hamidi, S. R., Aziz, A. A., Shuhidan, S. M., Aziz A. A., & Mokhsin M. (2018). SMEs maturity model assessment of IR4.0 digital transformation. In Lokman A., Yamanaka T., Lévy P., Chen K., Koyama S. (Eds), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research 2018. KEER 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, (pp. 721-732). Vol 739. Singapore: Springer.
Hizam-Hanafiah, M., Soomro, M. A., & Abdullah, N.L. (2020). Industry 4.0 readiness models: A systematic literature review of model dimensions. Information, 11, 364.
Hongxiong, Y., & Xiaowen, X. (2022, February). Research on computer evaluation index system of digital maturity of automotive supply chain. IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Big Data and Algorithms (EEBDA) (pp. 442-446). IEEE.
Kiraz, A., Canpolat, O., Erkan, E. F., & Uygun, Ö. (2019). Assessing Industry 4.0 tendency with IMPULS criteria: A fuzzy cognitive map application [in Turkish: IMPULS kriterleri ile Endüstri 4.0 eğiliminin değerlendirilmesi: Bir bulanık bilişsel harita uygulaması]. Academic Platform-Journal of Engineering and Science, 7(1), 14-23, Doi: https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.332543
Klötzer, C., & Pflaum, A. (2017). Toward the development of a maturity model for digitalization within the manufacturing industry’s supply chain. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (pp. 4210–4219).
Kutlu Gündoğdu F, & Kahraman C. (2019). Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36(1), 337-52. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181401
Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., & Kahraman, C. (2021). Hospital performance assessment using interval-valued spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Decision Making with Spherical Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications, 392, 349-373. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45461-6_15
Leyh, C., Schäffer, T., Bley, K. & Forstenhäusler, S. (2017). Assessing the IT and software landscapes of Industry 4.0 enterprises: The maturity model SIMMI 4.0. In Ziemba E. (Eds), Information Technology for Management: New Ideas and Real Solutions. ISM 2016, AITM 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 277. Cham: Springer.
Nahavandi, B., Homayounfar, M., & Daneshvar, A. (2023). A fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for evaluation of knowledge management effectiveness in research centers. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 15(1), 1-30.
Nick, G. A., Szaller, A., Bergman, J., & Várgedő, T. (2019). Industry 4.0 readiness in Hungary: Model, and the first results in connection to data application. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 289-294. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.185
Özçelik, T. Ö., Erkollar, A. & Cebeci, H. İ. (2018, October). Industry 4.0 (digital) maturity level determination application for a manufacturing business [in Turkish: Bir İmalat İşletmesi için Endüstri 4.0 (Dijital) Olgunluk Seviyesi Belirleme Uygulaması]. 5th International Management Information Systems Conference, Ankara, Turkey.
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31, 127-182, Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8
Pacchini, A. P. T., Lucato, W. C., Facchini, F., & Mummolo, G. (2019). The degree of readiness for the implementation of Industry 4.0. Computers in Industry, 113, 103125. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103125
Poveda, C. A. (2023). Using multi-criteria decision-making to assess the importance of human capital in meeting the goals and objectives of sustainable development: An application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 15(1), 1-31. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v15i1.1067
Rafeal, L. D., Jaione, G. E., Cristina, L., & Ibon, S. L. (2020). An Industry 4.0 maturity model for machine tool companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120203. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120203
Ramos, M. O., Silva, E. M., & Lima-Júnior, F. R. (2020). A fuzzy AHP approach to select suppliers in the Brazilian food supply chain. Production, 30, 1-16. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20200013
Rossmann, A. (2018). Digital maturity: Conceptualization and measurement Model. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2018), San Francisco, USA, (pp. 1–9).
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill. International, Translated to Russian, Portuguese, and Chinese, Revised editions, Paperback (1996, 2000). Pittsburgh: RWS Publications
Salume, P. K., Barbosa, M. W., Pinto, M. R., & Sousa, P. R. (2021). Key dimensions of digital maturity: A study with retail sector companies in Brazil. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 22(6), 1–29. Doi:10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMD210071
Sarı, T. (2020). Development of an Industry 4.0 maturity model by Analytic Hierarchy Process: Case of food and beverage manufacturing sector. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 3526-3549. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1597
Schumacher, A., Erol, S. & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing INDUSTRY 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises, Procedia CIRP, 52, 161-166. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040
Smarandache, F. (2003). Definiton of neutrosophic logic-a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy logic. EUSFLAT Conference (pp. 141-146). https://doi.org/0.2139/ssrn.272158
Sriram, R. M. & Vinodh, S. (2020). Analysis of readiness factors for Industry 4.0 implementation in SMEs using COPRAS, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38(5), 1178-1192. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-04-2020-0121
Stefan, L., Thom, W., Dominik, L., Dieter, K. & Bernd, K., (2018). Concept for an evolutionary maturity based Industry 4.0 migration model, Procedia CIRP, 72, 404-409. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.155
Stentoft, J., Wickstrom, K. A., Philipsen, K., & Haug, A. (2019), Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: Empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers, Production Planning and Control, 32(10), 811-828. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768318
Szejka, A. L., Rocha, T., Junior, O. C., & Freitas R. L. (2020). A preliminary discussion of the ACATECH 4.0 and AHP to measure enterprise maturity level index. Transdisciplinary Engineering for Complex Socio-technical Systems – Real-life Applications, 12, 143-150. Doi: https://doi.org/10.32333/ATDE200071
Tavčar, J., Demšar, I. & Duhovnik, J. (2018). Engineering change management maturity assessment model with lean criteria for automotive supply chain. Journal of Engineering Design, 29(4-5), 235-257. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1463513
Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 529-539. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418
Ustaoğlu N. (2019). A maturity model for digital transformation, [Doctoral dissertation, Sabancı University, Thesis Number: 608242]. Sabancı University Research Database. https://research.sabanciuniv.edu/id/eprint/39704
Vogel-Heuser, B., & Hess, D. (2016). Guest editorial Industry 4.0–prerequisites and visions. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 13(2), 411-413. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2016.2523639
Vrchota, J. & Pech, M. (2019). Readiness of enterprises in Czech Republic to implement Industry 4.0: Index of Industry 4.0. Applied Sciences, 9(24), 5405. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245405
Westerman, G., Tannou, M., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., & McAfee, A. (2012). The digital advantage: How digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry. MIT Sloan Management and Capgemini Consulting, MA, 2, 2-23.
Yezhebay, A., Sengirova, V., Igali, D., Abdallah, Y. O., & Shehab, E. (2021, April). Digital maturity and readiness model for Kazakhstan SMEs. IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST) (pp. 1-6).
Zadeh, L. A. (1996). Fuzzy sets. In Lotfi A Zadeh, George J. Klir, and Bo Yuan (Eds.) Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: selected papers (pp. 394-432). World Scientific.
Zayat, W., Kilic, H. S., Yalcin, A. S., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2023). Application of MADM methods in Industry 4.0: A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 177, 109075. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109075
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.