In this paper we analyse the response of several methods to construct indices for consistent multiple comparison. We consider also the close formal connection between the comparison of preference judgements and the comparison of economic aggregates. To evaluate the various scaling methods, we have used official data furnished by Eurostat, consequently our analysis is based on real-life data and not on simulations as is usually the case in study in this kind. The most important results that we have achieved are the close concordance of the weights obtained with the various methods and the robustness of the evaluations performed.
Ratio-scale matrices, Multiple comparisons, Index numbers
European Journal of Operational Research 141, 200-216.
Blankmeyer, E. (1987). Approaches to consistency adjustments. Journal of
Optimization Theory and Applications, 54, 479-488.
Carriere, J., Finster, M. (1992). Statistical Theory for Ratio Model of Paired
Comparisons. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 450-460.
Cogger, K.O., Yu, P.L. (1985). Eigenweight vectors and least distance
approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratios. Journal of
Optimization Theory and Applications, 46, 483-491.
Crowford, G., Williams C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjectives judgements
matrices. Journal of the Mathematica Psychology 29, 387-405.
Diewert, W. E., Nakamura, A. O. (1993). Essays in index number theory. vol. 1 North
Dodd, F.J., Donegan, H.A., McMaster, T.B.M. (1995). Reassessment of consistency
criteria in judgment matrices. The Statistician 44, 1, 31-41.
Eltetö, O., Köves, T. (1964). One Index Computation Problem of International
Coparision. Statisztikai Szemle.
Eurostat (1985). Purchasing power parities and related economic indicator. Result
Eurostat (2000). Purchasing power parities and related economic indicator. Result
Geary, R. G. (1958). A Note on the Comparison of Excange Rate and Purchasing
Power Between Countries. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 121, Part I.
Gerardi, D. (1978). Alcuni aspetti metodologici riguardanti il calcolo delle parità di
potere di acquisto tra i paesi della comunità europea. Atti della 29^ Riunione
Scientifica della Società Italiana di Statistica.
Gini, C. (1924). Quelques Consideration on Sujet de la Construction des Nombres
Indices des Prix et des Question Analogues. Metron Vol. 4 n. 1.
Golany, B., Kress, M. (1993). A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtainig
weights from ratio-scale matrices. European Journal of Operational Research 69,
Guitouni, A., Martel, J.M. (1998). Tentative guidelines to help choosing an
appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research 109, 501-521.
Haines, L.M., (1998). Interval Judgements in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A
Statistical Perspective..in T.J.Stewart e R.C. Honert (van den) (eds), Trends in
Multicriteria Decision Making. Lecure Notes in Economics and Mathematical
Systems, n. 465, 87-95, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Khamis, S. H. (1969). A New System of Index Number for National Purposes. Atti
della 97^ Sessione dell’Istituto Internazionale di Statistica.
Lootsma, F.A., Ramanathan, R., Schuijt, H. (1998). Fairness and Equity via Concepts
of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. in T.J.Stewart e R.C. Honert (van den) (eds),
Trends in Multicriteria Decision Making. Lecure Notes in Economics and
Mathematical Systems, n. 465, 215-226, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Lootsma, F. A. (1997). Multicriteria decision analysis in a decision tree. European
Journal of Operational Research 101, 442-451.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York.
Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G. (1984). Comparison of eigenvalues, logaritmic least
squares and squared methods in estimating ratios. Mathematical Modelling 5, 309-
Stuvel, G. (1989). The Index-Number Problem and its Solution. The Macmillan Press
Szulc, B. (1964). Index Number of Multilateral Regional Comparison. Przeglad
Statystieny n. 3.
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.