Selecting suitable suppliers of ICT products is always a challenging task for a procuring entity since it requires the consideration of multiple, competing, tangible and intangible criteria in determining optimal suppliers of a given product. This study investigated the evaluation criteria of suppliers of ICT products used by Moi University with a view to developing a multicriteria decision analysis model for evaluating the performance of suppliers of ICT products.Â Hence, the study was guided by a variation of Saatyâ€™s Analytical Hierarchy Process theory of measurement and targeted a population of 55 respondents comprised of 33 ICT staff and 22 procurement staff. Seventeen companies who bid to supply ICT products were targeted. Purposive sampling was used to select 7 companies who supply ICT products as per their prequalification status and there were 16 respondents; 11 from the Procurement unit and 5 from the ICT directorate respectively. Data was collected using questionnaires and documentary reviews. The study findings demonstrated that quality and transport and communication logistics were the most preferred evaluation criteria and sub criteria respectively, and the respondents had different preferential treatment on suppliers of ICT products as per the evaluation sub criterions. It is recommended that the model be adopted to assist the procurement unit in evaluating suppliers of ICT products and be customized for use in evaluating suppliers of other products at the University and other public institutions in Kenya.Â Â
AHP, ICT product, Multicriteria Decision Analysis, performance evaluation, Suppliers of ICT products
G.O.K. (2015). Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act [online]
G.O.K.(2009).Public Procurement Manual for ICT [online]
Dickson, G.W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5-17.
Drucker ,P. F. (2002). The effective executive: The definitive guide to getting the right things done. United Kingdom: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.
Mwikali R. and Kavale S. (2012). Factors affecting the selection of optimal suppliers in procurement management. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 12(14), 189-193.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. Doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Shalle, N.I & Guyo, W. & Amuhaya, I.M. (2014). Effects of buyer/supplier collaboration on e- procurement performance in state corporations in Kenya. European Journal of Management Sciences and Economics, 1(4), 170-185.
Samoei, D.K., Gichoya, D., & Odero, D. (2016). Management strategies for consumer supplier relationship in Kenya: A case of suppliers of information communication technology products in Moi University. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research, 6(12).
Samoei, D.K. (2016). A modular neural network model for evaluation and selection of suppliers of information communications technology products at Moi University. Unpublished Masterâ€™s Thesis, Moi University , Eldoret, Kenya.
Tahriri, F., Osman, M. R., Ali, A., & Yusuff, R. M. (2008). A review of supplier selection methods in manufacturing industries. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 15(3), 201-208.
Team, M. C., & Tummala, V. R. (2001). An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 29(2), 171-182. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.