##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 24, 2015
Martin Jantscher Christopher Schwarz Erwin Zinser

Abstract

The order in which service engineers in the field of IT service management decide to resolve incidents is crucial considering the impact it has on the business performance of the IT service provider. A possible solution to reduce negative impacts is to support service engineers by means of a decision support system that calculates priorities for the incidents based on their business impact. Considering these priorities in their decisions, service engineers can help reduce such negative impacts on the IT service provider’s business. The aim of this study was to incorporate the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method into a software tool to prioritize incidents according to the severity of their business impact. As a result, a decision support system called Incident Prioritizer (IP) was developed. It uses the AHP method to calculate priorities for incidents based on typical criteria that are relevant in the field of IT service management to assess the business impact of incidents. These criteria are commonly defined by the management of an IT service provider organization, and reflect the management’s understanding of the business impact that is caused by incidents. The results suggest that the AHP method can be successfully applied for the given problem of incident prioritization. The prioritization is facilitated by an AHP decision model that consists of only one level of criteria and considers judgments from human beings as well as data from external information systems.


http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v7i1.284

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process, IT Service Management, Decision Support System, Incident Prioritizer, ITIL

References
Beims, M. (2010). IT-Service management in der praxis mit ITIL 3. Munich: Hanser
Verlag.
ITIL. (2014). Endorsed software tools, http://www.itilofficialsite.com/SoftwareScheme/EndorsedSoftwareTools/EndorsedSoftwareTools.aspx
(Accessed March 31, 2014)
Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2011a). ITIL® Service Design.
Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2011b). ITIL® Service Operation.
OGC. (2007). ITILv3 - Service operation. Norwich: The Stationary Office.
ODM. (2010). Open decision maker - User manual [PDF-File],
http://sourceforge.net/projects/opendecisionmak/files/latest/download?source=files
(Accessed May 20, 2014)
Orta, E., Ruiz, M., Hurtado, N. and Gawn, D. (2014). Decision-making in IT service
management: a simulation based approach. Decision Support Systems, 66, 36-51.
Power, D.J. (2002). Decision support systems: Concepts and resources for managers.
Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Repschlaeger, R., Proehl, R. and Zarnekow, R. (2014). Cloud service management
decision support: An application of AHP for provider selection of a cloud-based IT
service management system. Intelligent Decision Technologies, 8, 95–110.
Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, International
Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
Wagner, G. (2012). Semantik ITSM (Master thesis). Graz: FH JOANNEUM University of
Applied Sciences.
Wan, J. and Wan, X. (2012). Case study on M company best practice with global IT
management. Technology and Investment, 3, 143-148.
Wan, J., Zhang, H. and Wan, D. (2011). Evaluation on Information Technology Service
Management Process with AHP. Technology and Investment, 2, 38-46.
Section
Articles