Published Feb 25, 2015
Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán Mónica García-Melón Vicent Estruch-Guitart


The influence of the participation of stakeholders in environmental planning is a real problem that has not been fully tackled in the existing literature. The influences exerted in the decision making process by different stakeholders, who want to satisfy their own interests, need to be analyzed in order to make a model of the problem that is closer to reality. The aim of this paper is to analyze these influences in a specific environmental problem, namely rice straw management in the Natural Park of La Albufera, Valencia (Spain), by means of the ANP methodology. The main question we explored was how to measure the influence among stakeholders. This a complex question because it is difficult for a stakeholder to answer the direct question, “Who do you think exerts more influence on you when you have to solve a problem?†In this work, we assumed that information exchange is the tool to measure the influence among the individuals in the network. These data are used to solve the ANP model. The final aim was to prove the utility of ANP to measure the influences among stakeholders in a Social Network.



Download data is not yet available.



Analytic Network Process, stakeholder analysis, participatory decision making

Apostolopoulou, E., Drakou, E. G., & Pediaditi, K. (2012). Participation in the management of Greek Natura 2000 sites: evidence from a cross-level analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 308–18.Biggs, S., &Matsaert, H. (1999). An actor-oriented approach for strengthening research and development capabilities in natural resource systems. Public Administration and Development, 19(3), 231–262. Brugha, R., & Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis : a review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 239–246. Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Management Review, 6(1),21–53. Campo, P. C., Bousquet, F., & Villanueva, T. R. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders within a development project. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1302–1321.Charnley, S., & Engelbert, B. (2005). Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA’s superfund community involvement program. Journal of Environmental Management, 77(3), 165–82. Davies, A. L., & White, R. M. (2012). Collaboration in natural resource governance: reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management, 112, 160–9. Elgin, D., & Weible, C. (2013). A stakeholder analysis of Colorado climate and energy issues using policy snalytical vapacity and the advocacy coalition framework. Review of Policy Research, 30(1), 114–133. European Community(2003). Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation . Official Journal of the European Union, L156, 17–24.García-Melón, M., Estruch-Guitart, V., Aragonés-Beltrán, P., & Monterde-Roca, B. (2013). Social Network Analysis in participatory environmental decision making. The case of Spanish wetland La Albufera. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Multicriteria Decision Making. Goosen, H., Janssen, R., & Vermaat, J. E. (2007). Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making. Ecological Engineering, 30(2),187–199. Hage, M., Leroy, P., & Petersen, A. C. (2010). Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production. Futures, 42(3),254–264.
IJAHPArticle : Aragonés-Beltrán, García-Melón/Analysis of the Participation of Stakeholders in Environmental Management Based onANP: Application to a Spanish Natural ParkInternational Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process14Vol. 7Issue 1 2015ISSN 1936-6744http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v7i1.276Isaac, M. E. (2012). Agricultural information exchange and organizational ties: The effect of network topology on managing agrodiversity. Agricultural Systems, 109, 9–15. Janssen, M. A., Goosen, H., & Omtzigt, N. (2006). A simple mediation and negotiationsupport tool for water management in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(1-2),71–84. Larson, S., De Freitas, D. M., & Hicks, C. C. (2013). Sense of place as a determinant of people’s attitudes towards the environment: Implications for natural resources management and planning in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Journal of Environmental Management, 117, 226–34. Mushove, P., & Vogel, C. (2005). Heads or tails? Stakeholder analysis as a tool for conservation area management. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 184–198. O’Toole, K., Keneley, M., & Coffey, B. (2013). The participatory logic of coastal management under the project state: Insights from the Estuary Entrance Management Support System (EEMSS) in Victoria, Australia. Environmental Science & Policy, 27, 206–214. Prell, C., Hubacek, K., & Reed, M. (2009). Stakeholder analysis and Social Network Analysis in natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 22(6), 501–518. Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation forenvironmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Stringer, L. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5),1933–1949.Saaty, T. L. (2005). The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, (345–405), Springer