This study proposes a model for comparing the customer satisfaction indices of two or more ecommerce competitors in order to select the most preferred website in a specific context. The importance of customer satisfaction factors from the userâ€™s point of view were calculated in the specific context of ecommerce. This study takes a new step towards integrating satisfaction literature by proposing a model for ranking the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) factors based on users' expectations about different online contexts. Hence, the approach provides a new way to compare customer satisfaction among e-business competitors. The suggested model was shaped by merging the Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach with the ACSI for ecommerce. The model tested two Iranian e-recruitment websites through a survey designed and conducted via emails to those who had used both web sites. Subsequently, the relative importance of the factors was determined, and finally e-recruitment websites were compared with each other. As a result, the most preferred website with respect to different ACSI factors was chosen and the relative importance of each ACSI factor considering the influence it had on the use of the e-recruitment website and user satisfaction was identified.
Analytic Network Process (ANP), Multi Criteria decision making (MCDM), Online Satisfaction, Customer Satisfaction Index, Ebusiness
performance considering the role of intervening variables: Organizational infrastructures and business
processes reengineering. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12), 2697–2734.
Bayazit, O. (2006). Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions. Benchmarking: an
International Journal, 13(5), 566-579.
Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., Turkyilmaz, A., Delen, D., & Zaim, S. (2012). Measuring the efficiency of
customer satisfaction and loyalty for mobile phone brands with DEA. Expert Systems with Applications,
Chang, H. H., & Wang, H. W. (2011). The moderating effect of customer perceived value on online
shopping behavior. Online Information Review, 35(3), 333 – 359.
Chi, C. G., & Gursoy, D. (2009). Employee satisfaction, customer satisfaction, and financial performance:
An empirical examination. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, 245–253.
Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of
Marketing, 56(1), 6–21.
Fuller, J., & Matzler, K. (2008). Customer delight and market segmentation: An application of the threefactor
theory of customer satisfaction on life style groups. Tourism Management, 29, 116-126.
Graja, H., & McManis, J., (2001). Modelling user interaction with e-commerce servers. Springer
Berlin Heidelberg, 2093, 803-810.
Hsu, P. F. (2012). Selection model based on ANP and GRA for independent media agencies. Quality &
Quantity, 46(1), 1-17.
Hsu, S. H. (2008). Developing an index for online customer satisfaction: Adaptation of American
customer satisfaction index. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 3033–3042.
Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2007). Selection of logistics service provider: an analytic network process
(ANP) approach. Omega, 35(3), 274-289.
Keramati, A., & Salehi, M. (2013). Website success comparison in the context of e-recruitment: An
analytic network process (ANP) approach. Applied Soft Computing, 13(1), 173–180.
Kujala, J., & Ahola, T. (2005). The value of customer satisfaction surveys for project-based
organizations: symbolic, technical, or none. International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), 404–
Kumar, V., Sharma, A., Shah, R., & Rajan, B. (2013). Establishing profitable customer loyalty for
multinational companies in the emerging economies: A conceptual framework. Journal of International
Marketing, 21(1), 57-80.
Liu, X., Zeng, X., Xu, Y., & Koehl, L. (2008). A fuzzy model of customer satisfaction index in ecommerce.
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 77 (5-6), 512–521.
Luo, X., Wieseke, J., & Homburg, C. (2012). Incentivizing CEOs to build customer- and employee-firm
relations for higher customer satisfaction and firm value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
Saaty, R. W. (2003). Decision making in complex environment: The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for
decision making and the analytic network process (ANP) for decision making with dependence and
feedback. Pittsburgh: Super Decisions.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of
Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.
Saaty, T. L. (2004). Super decisions software. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and applications of the analytic network process: Decision making with
benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic network
process: Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and
risks. New York: Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC.
Saaty, T. L., & Sodenkamp, M. (2008). Making decisions in hierarchic and network systems. Int. J.
Applied Decision Sciences, 1(1), 24-79.
Sadeghi, M., Rashidzadeh, M. A., & Soukhakian, M. A. (2012). Using analytic network process in a
group decision-making for supplier selection. Informatica, 23(4), 621–643.
Schaupp, L. C., & Bélanger, F. (2005). A conjoint analysis of online consumer satisfaction. Journal of
Electronic Commerce Research, 6(2), 95-111.
Singh, M. (2002). E-services and their role in B2C e-commerce. Journal of Management Service Quality,
Taslicali, A. K., & Ercan, S. (2006). The analytic hierarchy & the analytic network Processes in
multicriteria decision making: A comparative study. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies,
Tullis, T., & Bill, A. (2008). Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting
usability metrics. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Wood, F. B., Siegel, E. R., Feldman, S., Love, C. B., Rodrigues, D., Malamud, M., Lagana, M., & Crafts,
J. (2008). Web evaluation at the US National Institutes of Health: Use of the American customer
satisfaction index online customer survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10, e4.
Yang, J., & Ding, Y. (2009). B2B e-commerce website customer satisfaction: a formula and scale.
International Asia Symposium on Intelligent Interaction and Affective Computing. IEEE Xplore, Wuhan,
Copyright of all articles published in IJAHP is transferred to Creative Decisions Foundation (CDF). However, the author(s) reserve the following:
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain permission from CDF as well. However, CDF may grant rights with respect to journal issues as a whole.
- The right to use all or parts of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, textbooks, or reprint books.
- The authors affirm that the article has been neither copyrighted nor published, that it is not being submitted for publication elsewhere, and that if the work is officially sponsored, it has been released for open publication.
The only exception to the statements in the paragraph above is the following: If an article published in IJAHP contains copyrighted material, such as a teaching case, as an appendix, then the copyright (and all commercial rights) of such material remains with the original copyright holder.
CDF will receive permission for publication of copyrighted material in IJAHP. This permission is not transferable to third parties. Permission to make electronic and paper copies of part or all of the articles, including all computer files that are linked to the articles, for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage.
This permission does not apply to previously copyrighted material, such as teaching cases. In paper copies of the article, the copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date should be visible. To copy otherwise is permitted provided that a per-copy fee is paid.
To republish, to post on servers, or redistribute to lists requires that you post a link to the IJAHP article, which is available in open access delivery mode. Do not upload the article itself.
Authors are permitted to present a talk, based on a paper submitted to or accepted by IJAHP, at a conference where the paper would not be published in a copyrighted publication either before or after the conference and where the author did not assign copyright to the conference or related publisher.