##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 18, 2012
Patrizia Lombardi Silvia Giordano

Abstract

This paper illustrates a novel application of an Analytic Network Process (ANP) in the field of Smart cities with the aim of investigating the interrelations between the components and sectors of Smart cities. Although there is no agreement on the exact definition of a Smart city, a number of main dimensions can be identified through literature review and these include: smart economy, smart mobility, smart environment, smart people, smart living, and smart governance. These six dimensions are used to evaluate four different policy visions of the city of the future as derived from the Joint Programme Initiatives “Urban Europe†(JPI-EU). The results of the evaluation show that the Entrepreneurial City is the policy vision with higher priorities in all the sectors considered in the model, i.e. Universities, Government, Industry and Civil Society. Some relevant urban planning and policy implications of this vision are provided in the conclusion.


http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v4i1.108

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Analytic Network Process, Smart Cities performances, Triple Helix Approach.

References
Abler, R., Adams, J. S., Gould P. (1971). Spatial organization: the geographer's
view of the world. Michigan: Prentice-Hall.
Acs, Z.J., Groot, H.L.F. de and Nijkamp P. (2002). The Emergence of the Knowledge
Economy, A Regional Perspective. Berlin: Springer.
Adams W.J. and Saaty R., (2003). Super Decisions Software Guide. Retrieved from
http://www.superdecisions.com
Benner, C. (2003). Learning Communities in a learning region: the soft infrastructure
of cross-firm learning networks, Environment and Planning A, 35, 1809-1830.
Caragliu, A, Del Bo, C. & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of
Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82.
Deakin, M. (2010). SCRAN: the Smart Cities (inter) Regional Academic Network
Supporting the Development of a Trans-National Comparator for the Standardisation
of eGovernment Services, In Reddick, C. Comparative E-government: An Examination
of E-Government Across Countries, (pp. 425-446) Berlin: Springer Press.
EU (2007-2013). Smart Cities is a North Sea Intereg 4B project. Retrieved from
http://www.northsearegion.eu/ivb/projects/details/&tid=84
Etzkowitz H. and Zhou C. (2006). Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability,
Science and Public Policy, 33(1), 77–83.
Ezkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University, Industry and Government. London:
Routledge.
Etzkowitz H. and Leydesdorf L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National
Systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations,
Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
http://www.elsevier.nlrlocatereconbase
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
Fusco Girad, L., Lombardi, P., Nijkamp, P. (2009). Creative urban design and development
(special issue), International Journal of Services Technology and Management,
13( 2/3/3,)111-115.
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., Meijers, E.
(2007). Smart cities – Ranking of European medium-sized cities, Centre of Regional
Science, Vienna UT, October 2007. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from
http://www.smart-cities.eu
Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent cities: innovation, knowledge systems and digital
spaces. London: Spon Press.
Leydesdorff, L. and Deakin, M. (2011). The triple helix of smart cities: a neoinstitutional
perspective, Journal of Urban Technology, 18 (2), 53-63.
Lombardi P., Giordano S., Caragliu A., Del Bo C., Deakin M., Nijkamp P., Kourtit
K. and Farouh H. (2012). An Advanced Triple-Helix Network Model for Smart Cities
Performance, In Y. Ozge (Ed.), Green and Ecological Technologies for Urban Planning:
Creating Smart Cities, IGI Global, Hershey, pp. 59-73.
Lombardi P., Giordano S., Farouh H. and Yousef W. (2012). Modelling the Smart
cities performances, The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25 (2), 133 -
145.
Lombardi P., Cooper I, Paskaleva K & Deakin M. (2009). The challenge of designing
user-centric e-services: European dimensions, In C.Reddick Strategies for Local EGovernment
Adoption and Implementation: Comparative Studies, 461-478. Hershey,
PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Lombardi P. (2011). New challenges in the evaluation of Smart Cities. Network
Industries Quarterly, 13 (3), 8-10.
Nijkamp, P. and Kourtik, K. (2011). Joint Programming Initiative (JPI) on Urban
Europe. Global challenges and local responses in the urban century. A scoping document,
27, VU University Amsterdam, 2011.
Rosenthal, S.S., and Strange, W.C. (2001). The determinants of agglomeration. Journal
of Urban Economics, 50, 191-229.
Saaty, T.L. (2005). Theory and applications of the Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh:
RWS Publications.
Shapiro, J. M. (2008). Smart cities: quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects
of human capital, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (2), 324-335.
Torres, L., Vicente, P. and Basilio, A. (2005). e-Government developments on delivering
public services among EU cities, Government Information Quarterly, 22, 217-
238.
Van Soom, E. (2009). Measuring levels of supply and demand for e-services and egovernment:
a toolkit for cities. Smart Cities Research Brief, N. 3, Retrieved February
25, 2009, from http://www.smartcities.info/research-briefs.
Wakelin M. (1990). Globalization of Regional Development. In Gibson, D. V.,
Kozmetsky, G., Smilor, R. W. The technopolispPhenomenon. Smart cities, fast systems,
global networks. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.
Section
Articles